@ThatCrazyDude d be no reason for them to stay in the EU.
My prediction is that the EU will abolish the veto of members, another guess is that they will change how votes are counted to penalize nationalist parties. A third change is a split, whereby a "deeper" EU is created, and funds and "benefits" to the outer EU will gradually be restricted in the hope that they will join the inner EU where they give away their national sovereignty.
Let's see if 10 years time if I am correct!
@ThatCrazyDude As long as individual countries have veto power in important questions, nothing will happen, since the EU cannot enforce anything. The countries will just refuse, and block important questions, and that is that. Just look at Hungary, they happily spied on behalf of russia, and the worst that happen is that they did not get some EU funds.
If EU starts to withhold funds en masse, it will risk getting humiliated by more countries eventually leaving since without EU funds there woul
@Incal We must pray that german scientists soon develop an alternative to the US patriot missiles with a longer range.
Then Ukraine can start to rain bombs on russia for real.
Come on germany, please channel Werner von Braun! The world needs it!
@Incal Without watching, my guess would be that the EU will make changes in order to secure a socialist majority in the parliament, and to minimize the influence of nationalist and libertarian parties fighting the EU.
@Dan_Ramos I wonder if any of them are generating profits or if they will eventually become victims and crash together with the upcoming AI crash?
As a technologist, I would never dream of investing in technology. It seems like the rock solid technology I like, always loses out to marketing driven technology companies.
Only open source seems to have some staying power.
@Sovereign Go team Palavi! 🇮🇱
@shortstories I like wagyu, the Donald Trump of marbled beef! Lean beef is not so good.
@skdh Try meat. Has done wonders for Jordan Peterson!
Stay away from vegetables, they are the invention of the devil! 😎
@paulg Another classic is the "back to nature" people talking about how hunter gatherers of old, only had to work 2 hours per day. What they never talk about is that if the hunt was not successful you starved to death, and of course, how many infants died in child birth.
Technology and science works, and we should be thankful for it.
@deBaer @golemwire Would be interesting to see how many lines of code is dedicated to various hardware quirks. On the other hand, NetBSD may run on more cpu architectures than linux.
So the question remains... what does all that extra code do?
@matthew ssh port facing the internet, so I was not affected anyway, but still good to get the message, so now the system is updated.
@matthew My service provider performed well today. I got an email pointing at this bug, saying I should probably either disable the module or update the system.
Logged in, did an zypper up, rebooted, and all is well.
It took me about 3-4 minutes in total.
I like that my service provider sent me the email based on the public internet facing VM:s they have.
Then of course I only have one static web site and one hidden
I don’t want to run a mitigation that doesn’t need to be run. Just in case that introduces a problem in a system that is currently working fine and not exploitable.
So from what I’ve learned so far:
lsmod | grep algif_aead
this checks to see if the exploitable module is loaded.
You can check if the module is present in the system, but not currently loaded with:
modinfo algif_aead 2>/dev/null
If that returns information, the module is present and could be loaded.
But you have to have root privileges to load the module.
So my logic is that if
lsmod | grep algif_aead
returns nothing, the vulnerable Linux kernel module is not loaded and therefore not exploitable… even if the module is present on the system but not loaded.
Please correct me if I am wrong.
@ThatCrazyDude @EvilSandmich Yes, you do have a point. Maybe this is a sign that he has given up?
@sensei A crushing victory!
@ThatCrazyDude @EvilSandmich He could, but at what cost? It would turn the rest of the world against the US, and would make China and Russia seem like princes of peace. And now we're talking massive nukes naturally, not some kind of surgical strike, which we actually might see in the coming weeks.
@EvilSandmich @ThatCrazyDude Yes... he likes high risk, high reward scenarios. A bit too much for my taste.