houseoftolstoy @[email protected]

"Just pressure the politicians, man! It will totally be effective and not just amount to nothing getting done! Because we can VOTE them out if they do not listen."

Perhaps he did not say that here, but I am willing to bet that is the logical conclusion to his ending statement. As if elections matter when they are openly stolen. I am willing to bet he also claims that the elections are completely fair and above board too.

https://www.theamericanconservative.com/why-is-npr-promoting-teaching-children-how-to-give-oral-sex/

Statements like this are why I have no respect for Rod Dreher:

"At some point, the public is going to have to start throwing stuff. Meaning voters are going to have to use the only tool they have -- pressuring elected politicians to change the way they spend the public's own money -- to fight back against the cultural elites who despise them, and who are corrupting our kids with this filth. The backlash is long overdue."

I am aware that the feminist and equality policies only come in after the prosperity is there, but too many people do not realize this. They think that the relationship is the inverse, and that leads to ruin for millions of people.

It is very, very important to understand the difference between "because of" and "in spite of." While I don't think the concept is not too hard to understand, many people fail to understand this when applying it to observations.

Many countries who are have tried to copy the model of Western countries have failed when they do not realize that our countries have been successful IN SPITE of feminism and equality bullshit, not because of it.

@redmaple I am not surprised that they are lying or that they are doubling down, I just expected them to be less sloppy. Those who cannot see through the poorly constructed lies will only get in more trouble. I suppose that is natural selection.

@khaosklub Yes, but I expect them to be less sloppy than this. Usually they would say something like "there's no evidence of this," making it technically true.

It is so funny how journalists try to "debunk" things only to demonstrate that the "conspiracy theorists" are indeed probably correct.

"It was not the stabbing wounds that caused him to die, he died because of too much blood loss!"

https://archive.is/tLcjF

Get a load of this:

>As soon as news of Wahl's death spread, so did rumors about what killed him. One theory was that the COVID vaccine was responsible. It wasn't, and an autopsy later showed that Wahl died from an aortic aneurysm.

Aneurysms. Isn't that when you have a bulge in your blood vessels. I wonder, could blood clots lead to an aneurysm? And don't the "vaccines" cause blood clot and heart issues?

Not sure if the journalist is a retard or a liar. Either fits.

@Humpleupagus @ademan That is a big problem with the anti-police left. All the gay and retarded policies they want ultimately requires the very police they hate to keep the enforcement and funding of those laws. And no, libertarian leftists are just delusional in thinking that their policies do not require authoritarian rule to operate.

@Trigg3rH4ppy You mean to tell me that I should be suspicious that Black Panther had a 100% rating in spite of the fact that most capeshit movies are just like the label describes?

@furgar No lie, I have had this discussion before there was any coof with coworkers. And I know it was pre-coof because we has it in office. They were talking about heart attacks while shoveling snow, and I remember being quite skeptical.

Maybe this time it was a coincidence, but I hate to think that they were already starting the gaslighting and planning early. If so, they got just plain sloppy with reports of video games causing heart attacks of all things.

@gusana Premise: women are bad at arguments, they often rely on shaming tactics such as "you are a lover incel." Examples are provided in said meme, and you did exactly the same thing. All you did was say "men are stupid too" and use more shaming language. I will grant you that you did not use point 2.

And know the difference between you're and your. You belittle others in ways you yourself are guilty of being.

@gusana If you are shitposting, fine. Do you realize the vast majority of communication is not present when written?

@gusana No you retard, that is not how circular logic works. The "I'm a man actually" is an example of a poor attempt to try and mask the fact that the only "arguments" brought up are shaming language. Exactly what you did.

"Everyone who disagrees with me is a woman" was never said by me. You still go with ad hominems, and bring nothing but shaming language. You are only proving the image more and more true.

@thor What defines your "fair share?" Not everyone is going to agree with what is considered fair for payments. Are there people who should get paid more for their work? Probably. But that is not how we determine compensation.

Your job might be very important, but if the skills required to do the job are abundant and the position is easily replaced with almost anybody else, then it most likely will not have high compensation.

Another thing, I don't think it is always unfair if someone is rich.

@gusana Circular logic? Do you know the definition of that term? You started with the exact same playbook as described, and are still on that same playbook.

More shaming language: "insecure." Such a womanly term, and most likely projection. And I have yet to meet a woman who made me feel insecure with her intelligence. And you are not impressing me with any intelligence either, using terms you clearly know nothing about hoping that it is the right magic spell to win an argument.

@gusana You assume I want such women. I don't. I am a married man who wants nothing to do with that sort of "lifestyle."

Also, proving the "arguing with holes" point correct.