Show newer
You see goy, Sacred DemocracyLand doesn’t have secret political police, unlike mean ol Russia/China/Iran
These guys really think spending six figures for a BA in English makes them something special as opposed to just another guy stocking copies of "The Subtle Art of Not Giving a Fuck" at Barnes and Noble.

@houseoftolstoy @Terry Women don't need marriage when they can vote for the state to become their husband.

And there was another part where the tranny talked about how the black population in Detroit was screw over by the local government due to them artificially inflating values of homes to increase property taxes in order to remove residents.

Who do you think runs the government for the City of Detroit? I guarantee they are all Democrats, and I would not be shocked many of them were black too.

He does not bring up that detail, no surprise.

Show thread

Other silly things in this video include "The World Economic Forum is one of the most capitalist organizations there is" when it's chairman Klaus Scwhab is advocating for "stakeholder capitalism," which is just communism with a flimsy mask that calls itself capitalist. I have read his book The Great Reset, you deluded tranny. His ideas are by no means capitalist as their implementation would only take place with a heavy government hand.

Show thread

Did some hate watching of this video. Lots of leftist bullshit involved, but this part was peak irony. So the man who thinks himself a woman is discussing the topic of phantasms, something your mind does when dealing with contradictions by producing outlandish explanations.

Yes, the tranny is telling you that the "conspiracy theorists" are crazy while "she" is completely sane while larping as a woman. And he tries to throw it back by attacking those who do not accept tranny bullshit ideology.

Looks like the results are concluded. With the sample size that is totally scientific, it seems most men would be fine with such an arrangement. But I am willing to bet that most women would not be fine with this, even if they virtue signal that they would be.

But in the end, the faggots arguing that "men should embrace other roles" fail to understand that men would be fine accepting roles such as stay-at-home husband. It is the women who do not want this. So maybe lay off the men for once?

Show thread

Looks like the results are concluded. With the sample size that is totally scientific, it seems most men would be fine with such an arrangement. But I am willing to bet that most women would not be fine with this, even if they virtue signal that they would be.

But in the end, the faggots arguing that "men should embrace other roles" fail to understand that men would be fine accepting roles such as stay-at-home husband. It is the women who do not want this. So maybe lay off the men for once?

Show thread

Just saw a billboard ad from Planned Parenthood that said "LGBTQ children deserve proper sex educuation." I am not even sure what that is supposed to mean, but I have my guesses. And my guesses are that that graph on "what will happen if gay marriage is passed" pie graph is wrong and any lefty faggots that claim "the slippery slope is a FALLACY" are either stupid or liars.

Because if they are not teaching gay sex in schools, then why would it make a difference how it is taught?

Overt actions would be the government stepping in directly. But covertly, we see many frivolous lawsuits to go through the courts while the government either sits by or is actively encouraging the people initiating the lawsuits to force companies to waste money on lawyers for cases that never should have gone to court.

My guess is salaries for do-nothing positions are cheaper than lawyers for many employers.

Show thread

Just think about how much more productive and efficient our economy would be if companies did not have to hire so many dead weight employees that are only there to avoid a lawsuit. A lot of money is wasted because our government will overtly or covertly make life a living hell for companies who do not bend the knee to DIE policies.

I really doubt employers want to throw money down the drain for positions that lead to not only no additional productivity, but often less productivity.

Hell, let's make a poll. Men, if you had a woman who earned enough to provide for a family with her work, would you be willing to be a "house husband?"

Added conditions, she will never cheat, divorce you, love you, and still see you as a proper man (fantasy land, I know, but this is all hypothetical).

Show thread
@houseoftolstoy I know that people stay anonymous for different reasons. I appreciate when someone tries to remain anonymous when they are publishing or creating something for public consumption. I like the idea that someone wants to be judged on the merits of what they've created and not what people will think and judge them by, because of their appearance, gender etc. It is a type of equality that I wish people valued more highly.

One addendum to make, the "love you" part is not a "will never." She will love you and see you as a proper man. I need to work on my wording sometimes.

Show thread

Hell, let's make a poll. Men, if you had a woman who earned enough to provide for a family with her work, would you be willing to be a "house husband?"

Added conditions, she will never cheat, divorce you, love you, and still see you as a proper man (fantasy land, I know, but this is all hypothetical).

Show thread

Another side topic, the amazing cope of "men can just adjust to not being the primary breadwinners by finding other roles such as working part time or being the husband that stays at home."

Great! Let's see how well that works when we try to sell that to women, who still want men to fulfill that provider role/earning more. It is like retards pushing these ideas never see what the landscape looks like. It turns out, the natural order of men earning more is preferred by both men and women.

Show thread

This thought came to mind when I was watching this video which has quite the bluepilled take about men becoming more right wing. Here, we can see the full display of the pro equality mindset that feminism is good and that those who oppose feminism only do so because they were "unfairly ahead."

What if men are just better at certain things than women? Such as math, science, athletics, and a variety of other things?

youtube.com/watch?v=54H8ppxnp8

Show thread
Show older
Merovingian Club

A club for red-pilled exiles.