Clarifying my stance on women's rights:
Negotiable:
Property rights
Working (with their man's permission)
Abortion (This is a tough one)
Arranged marraige
Non-negotiable:
Voting
Holding political office, press
College
Passports
Did I miss anything?
@basedbagel as for work and education, I'd advocate that they should be allowed to do both.
but with college, they are only allowed to go to women only colleges, and discouraged from attaining higher education (they have to meet a much higher standard). Though, honestly, most people shouldn't be going to college.
Academia should be reserved for those who think objectively.
Also when women go to school they think they are better than men who don't and then they don't have kids. And then we're back at square 1.
Can small minority of women handle it? Yes, but it's not worth risking demographic collapse IMO
@basedbagel that's why it should be discouraged. made difficult to accomplish and have high standards for doing so.
Academia should be reserved for those who are qualified, which most people, men or women, are not. the problem is lax standards and the government guaranteeing college for all.
most people should not be attending college. if a woman can pay her own way and has enough merit, then she should be allowed.
@basedbagel
But then women can also be limited on subjects they can attend college for. so an all women's college with women's career fields, like nursing or medicine.
There is no female-dominated profession that is essential to society functioning.
Nurses are just doctor's assistants and they only do it so they can marry doctors.
@basedbagel I mean, most professions are not essential to society functioning. many make it function smoother, but we could go back to the dark ages easy and have a functioning society.
Most people, men included, should not be going to college.
the idea is to stop welfare and have everyone pay their own way and acheive by the sweat of their brow.
if you block the few hardworking women from this, they become spearheads for women's rights.
@basedbagel
1) a screeching halt is still functioning. it's not collapsing
2) you just need a military and farmers for a society to function. we just need technological advancement because we need to compete with others, but even that's not necessarily true. look at afganistan, takes out tanks with sticks and rocks.
and the idea is to return to "back in the day"
@khaosklub
Not true.
You NEED police officers, soldiers, skilled tradesmen or society grinds to a SCREECHING HALT.
I agree most people shouldn't be in college.
A hardworking woman is an oxymoron. Maybe back in the day but in modern times, no way!