@white_male @Tfmonkey @VeganMGTOW @BowsacNoodle

Useful & Rare = More Valuable

Rare & not useful = Not Valuable

Common & not useful = Not Valuable

Blockchain money, paper money & electronic money are not valuable

The only value in paper & electronic money is paying taxes as a token to avoid going to jail

Without taxes paper & electronic money has no use and therefore nno valuee

@shortstories @Tfmonkey @VeganMGTOW @BowsacNoodle >Blockchain money, paper money & electronic money are not valuable
Valuable for their usefulness.
>The only value in paper & electronic money is paying taxes
That's just retarded. Fiat usefullness is in abstracting cost from barter. How the fuck are you going to implement factories that need thousands of different material inputs?
>Without taxes paper & electronic money has no use
Abstracted value transfer. Also enables accumulation of wealth for large projects.

@white_male @Tfmonkey @VeganMGTOW @BowsacNoodle

You pay factory workers in Asia manufacturing electronic goids in bags of rice

They can trade rice for electronic goods they want to purchase or they can eat it

@shortstories @Tfmonkey @VeganMGTOW @BowsacNoodle Cool, cool, now exchange rice for chemicals and other stuff that's worth between 1000:1 and 100:1 in weight to rice. Do it for hundred items. Said factory would gather all the rice, rising it's price and effectively making rice the fiat currency, the new gold.

@white_male @Tfmonkey @VeganMGTOW @BowsacNoodle

I do not have a problem with gold because you can make tools to use out of gold

If you take a gold coin and change the words and numbers printed on it but it has the same mass it is worth the same amount

If you change the words and numbers printed on paper money but it has the same mass then it's value changes

Does the ink or the paper make it valuable. Is it worth more if more ink is printed on the same paper to make the number bigger?

@shortstories @white_male @Tfmonkey @VeganMGTOW The piece of paper isn't the value. it's the promise of value enforced by the state. you're trading in strength of the government (stability, current and future prospects / GDP, threat of imprisonment and ability to enforce said threats, etc.) when you use fiat. This is known. The question of whether or not that OUGHT TO be valid is not the same as whether or not IT IS valid today. You're missing the is/ought distinction IMO.
Follow

@BowsacNoodle @Tfmonkey @VeganMGTOW @white_male

The value enforced by the State comes from taxes

Because taxes can only be paid exclusively in money

People need money to pay taxes in order for violence not to be done with them

Hence the value of money comes from the ability to trade it with the givernment in order to not go to jail

· · Web · 2 · 0 · 0
@shortstories @BowsacNoodle @Tfmonkey @VeganMGTOW Nah, we gave you earlier examples of rice becoming the dominant trade good and effectively the new currency. You're just ass mad you can eat bills and coins.
@shortstories @Tfmonkey @VeganMGTOW @white_male >Hence the value of money comes from the ability to trade it with the givernment in order to not go to jail
Yes. I have been saying that since I joined this conversation, however that's only a supplemental to the convenience it creates. I have nothing against bag-o-grainism, conceptually, but I am not blind to its faults.
Sign in to participate in the conversation
Merovingian Club

A club for red-pilled exiles.