The mayor of Arcadia admitted to acting as an illegal foreign agent of China in a federal plea deal unsealed on Monday.

Eileen Wang agreed with prosecutors that she worked with the People’s Republic of China to boost propaganda with a fake news website on US soil between 2020 and 2022. She was elected to Arcadia City Council in November 2022. The city is within LA County.

LA’s top federal prosecutor Bill Essayli said this is not the first time China has been caught trying try to exert its influence in the United states.

“Ms. Wang is just the latest to act as an agent for the PRC and it should terrify Americans that she was able to rise to the highest levels of local office in her city,” Essayli said. “I expect her to resign quickly if she hasn’t already.”

According to court documents, Wang worked with her then fiancé, Yaoning “Mike” Sun, on a web site called “U.S. News Center,” which claimed to be news source for Chinese Americans.

But in reality the pair were carrying out Beijing’s orders through the site, and sharing data on how many people had viewed the story with Chinese officials.

Wang and Sun “executed directives” from the Chinese government, posting propaganda designed to help China and reporting back to their masters with screenshots showing how many people viewed the stories, according to the plea agreement.

In one case, Wang’s spymaster ordered her to post a PRC-authored essay denying the existence of genocide and forced labor in the Xinjiang region, according to the document.

“There is no genocide in Xinjiang; there is no such thing as ‘forced labor’ in any production activity, including cotton production. Spreading such rumor is to defame China, destroy Xinjiang’s safety and stability,” wrote Wang’s master, according to the plea agreement.

Wang complied and her handler wrote back, “So fast, thank you everyone.”

In another case, Wang’s PRC boss commended her on page views received by a certain piece of propaganda. Wang wrote back, “Thank you leader”.

Wang is set to appear in court for arraignment in downtown Los Angeles on Monday afternoon. She faces a maximum of 10 years in prison.

nypost.com/2026/05/11/us-news/

In a sane world, no one with more than 1/8th Chinese ancestry would be allowed anywhere in America's academia, government, the military, or corporations. Not every one of them will spy and agitate for the old country and the communists ruling there, but enough of them will to the point you would have to be a damned fool to let them near any sensitive position.

To do otherwise is like going to a small country known for its high rates of AIDs and having unprotected sex with the prostitutes there or letting freakish trannies have alone time with your small children.

@Charles_in_Charge
The same can be said for any foreign nationality, but here we are living in the delusion of civic nationalism and multiculturalism.

@Bernard @Charles_in_Charge

you can hqve civic nationalism without multiculturalism

Everyone has to agree to hate the Kike religion and culture to enter but you can be any race

Follow

@Bernard @Charles_in_Charge

You can have a civic nationalist multiracial socuety that functions just fine as long as it is not multicultural

The problem was not that they let soneone in of what some people might call a mongoloid race

The problem was that they let someone in of Chinese culture

There might additionally have been a problem of the Chinese government threatening to do things to her relatives in China if she does not subvert the United States when she visits

1 of 2

· · Web · 2 · 1 · 3

@Bernard @Charles_in_Charge

2 of 2

Allowing people of 1 in 8 part Chinese biological ancestry in government would not solve the problem

They Chinese government could threaren to harm 1 of their grandparents if they have grandparents living in China even if they are one eigth Chinese

On the other hand if eomeone is 100% Chinese in biological ancestry but all their ancestors lived in America for so many generations that they have no close relatives in China they are less likely to subvert

@shortstories @Charles_in_Charge @Bernard "Must have no relatives living overseas" seems like one of those rules for a ruling position that was so obvious to the people of the past that they never bothered writing it down.

@Zergling_man @Bernard @Charles_in_Charge
Zergling said

""Must have no relatives living overseas" seems like one of those rules for a ruling position that was so obvious to the people of the past that they never bothered writing it down."

They had a rule written down called no titles of nobility

This prevented people from being in a position of the government in the United States while simultaneously accepting titles of nobility from a foreign country without the approval of Congress

1 of 2

@Zergling_man @Bernard @Charles_in_Charge

Preventing people with titles if nobility from serving in government would prevent relarives of foreign royal families from serving in the United States government but only to a limited extent

A bunch of the founding fathers were relatives to families overseas so they could not put must not have relatives overseas, instead you had to give up any titles of nobility without voted approval to serve in Government if you did

Royal Blood Presidents

2 of 2

@Zergling_man @Bernard @Charles_in_Charge

In spite of the titles of nobility restrictions a lot of Presidebts of the United States were relatives of royal families in Europe

Although if they are closer relatives on average than random white goyim USA citizens I do not know

@Zergling_man @Bernard @Charles_in_Charge

The titles of nobility restruction in the constituition of the United States is in

article 1 section 9 clause 8

They were going to add an additional ammendment also restricting titles of nobility but even if the additional ammendment did not pass the restriction on titles of nobility is still there in a different part of the constituition

If the additional ammendment passed it would just be banned in one more place possibly with extra restrictions

@Zergling_man @Bernard @Charles_in_Charge

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foreign_

Foreign Emoluments Clause

Article 1 Section 9 Clause 8

Prevents people from receiving certain kinds of bribes from certain kinds of foreign givernment officials without approval from congress such as gifts or titles of nobility

@Zergling_man @Bernard @Charles_in_Charge

Bribes are permitted if Congress votes to allow you to take the bribe but then it is called a subsidy instead of a bribe

If you take a bribe that is not from Israel and the congress did not vote for you to take the bribe then that is illegal

Congress is taking bribes from Israel for campaign funding so if Israel gives you campaign funding as a bribe then people have not got prosecuted

But if a country competing with Israel funds the campaign

1 of 2

@Zergling_man @Bernard @Charles_in_Charge

But if a country competing with Israel funds the campaign and you take the bribe you can be prosecuted

Israel might be having Trump prosecute foreigners who take welfare fraud money to prevent competition with other countries

For example if politicians are funded by Somalians in Minnesota many of whom are Muslim and those Somalians take welfare fraud money Israel might not like that because it views that as competition with Muslims

2 of 2

THEY OUR BITCHES N SHEEIT DAMN NIGGA WE AIN'T BREEDIN WIT DEM FUCKIN CHALKIES :yotsuba_no:

@Bernard @Charles_in_Charge

There used to be a fictional debate about ethics between socrates and confucious by a Professor on youtube

It was fictional because Socrates and Confucious did not meet each other in real life as far as I know and he is guessing what such a debate would be like

When you let in people who practice Confucian culture their moral value system is not based on principles but on authority figures

This is why Europe used to have more advanced science when they met Asians

I suspect that it's not always done because of a threat to relatives. Sometimes it might just be appealing to lingering feelings of patriotism or allegiance to the Han race.

@shortstories @Charles_in_Charge

A multiracial society is a multicultural society. Culture is downstream from race. You can turn a White person into a wigger, but that is difficult, awkward, and undesirable.

America was formed of very similar races with very similar cultures (Northern Europeans). With much friction and difficulty, they did gradually become a new American race and culture.

The titles of nobility restriction was necessary because so many fine Europeans of noble ancestry, including mine, came to America. The founders never imagined Chinese people would later be allowed as citizens.

Chinese were finally allowed to become citizens under very limited situations with strict quota in 1952 immigrationhistory.org/item/im, but they could never truly assimilate into American culture. They did not create too much problem and kept to themselves. They were not permitted into government until much later.

America originated as 4 different nations: Puritans, Quakers, Cavaliers, and Borderers.

Quakers folded and got absorbed into Puritans, which became modern Democrats.

A civil war was fought between P+Q and C+B.

Puritans imported zillions of Irish to fight the civil war, but Irish ended up taking Massachusetts away from them, now Puritans are almost entirely gone.

Ethnic groups ALWAYS struggle for dominance, it's an emergent behavior.

@cjd
Yes us colonial founding stock are disappearing. I have 6 grandparents from the Mayflower but many Irish and Norwegian ancestors too.

This is a great book on early American history. gutenberg.org/ebooks/60145

@shortstories @Charles_in_Charge

> 6 grandparents from the Mayflower

Puritans are probably best genetics on earth.

They had to pass a selection process to be allowed to join the colony, then they had to pass nature's selection process (winter).

@cjd
Yes half of the 104 died that first winter. They fared better than the earlier arrivals who settled in Jamestown who disappeared, most probably killed by Amerindians.

gutenberg.org/ebooks/68185
@shortstories
@Charles_in_Charge

@cjd

Not six ancestors or six great grandparents but six grandparents when someone only has four grandparents

I assume he means ancestors because grandparents of people alive now were from the early 20th century...
Sign in to participate in the conversation
Merovingian Club

A club for red-pilled exiles.