You can have a civic nationalist multiracial socuety that functions just fine as long as it is not multicultural
The problem was not that they let soneone in of what some people might call a mongoloid race
The problem was that they let someone in of Chinese culture
There might additionally have been a problem of the Chinese government threatening to do things to her relatives in China if she does not subvert the United States when she visits
1 of 2
2 of 2
Allowing people of 1 in 8 part Chinese biological ancestry in government would not solve the problem
They Chinese government could threaren to harm 1 of their grandparents if they have grandparents living in China even if they are one eigth Chinese
On the other hand if eomeone is 100% Chinese in biological ancestry but all their ancestors lived in America for so many generations that they have no close relatives in China they are less likely to subvert
@Zergling_man @Bernard @Charles_in_Charge
Zergling said
""Must have no relatives living overseas" seems like one of those rules for a ruling position that was so obvious to the people of the past that they never bothered writing it down."
They had a rule written down called no titles of nobility
This prevented people from being in a position of the government in the United States while simultaneously accepting titles of nobility from a foreign country without the approval of Congress
1 of 2
@Zergling_man @Bernard @Charles_in_Charge
Preventing people with titles if nobility from serving in government would prevent relarives of foreign royal families from serving in the United States government but only to a limited extent
A bunch of the founding fathers were relatives to families overseas so they could not put must not have relatives overseas, instead you had to give up any titles of nobility without voted approval to serve in Government if you did
Royal Blood Presidents
2 of 2
@Zergling_man @Bernard @Charles_in_Charge
In spite of the titles of nobility restrictions a lot of Presidebts of the United States were relatives of royal families in Europe
Although if they are closer relatives on average than random white goyim USA citizens I do not know
@Zergling_man @Bernard @Charles_in_Charge
The titles of nobility restruction in the constituition of the United States is in
article 1 section 9 clause 8
They were going to add an additional ammendment also restricting titles of nobility but even if the additional ammendment did not pass the restriction on titles of nobility is still there in a different part of the constituition
If the additional ammendment passed it would just be banned in one more place possibly with extra restrictions
@Zergling_man @Bernard @Charles_in_Charge
Bribes are permitted if Congress votes to allow you to take the bribe but then it is called a subsidy instead of a bribe
If you take a bribe that is not from Israel and the congress did not vote for you to take the bribe then that is illegal
Congress is taking bribes from Israel for campaign funding so if Israel gives you campaign funding as a bribe then people have not got prosecuted
But if a country competing with Israel funds the campaign
1 of 2
@Zergling_man @Bernard @Charles_in_Charge
But if a country competing with Israel funds the campaign and you take the bribe you can be prosecuted
Israel might be having Trump prosecute foreigners who take welfare fraud money to prevent competition with other countries
For example if politicians are funded by Somalians in Minnesota many of whom are Muslim and those Somalians take welfare fraud money Israel might not like that because it views that as competition with Muslims
2 of 2
@Zergling_man @Bernard @Charles_in_Charge
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foreign_Emoluments_Clause
Foreign Emoluments Clause
Article 1 Section 9 Clause 8
Prevents people from receiving certain kinds of bribes from certain kinds of foreign givernment officials without approval from congress such as gifts or titles of nobility