Show newer

@shortstories @PodunkPotato I don’t know but that it’s obvious the German establishment in the 1930s affirmed Scientific Racialist presuppositions that were abandoned and redacted throughout The West as a consequence of them losing the war - rather than based on objective merit.

Nigh every jew and their grandma claims Mengele did experiments on them; so it’s obviously a meme more than anything factual. Any actual data he obtained would not be accepted within the same paradigmatic framework he was operating within

@PodunkPotato @KingOfWhiteAmerica @shortstories Particle physics, which could be used as a weapon against Jews, fell into the hands of Jews.

See also: gun control, anti-zionism, nuclear energy, environmentalism, any form of non Marxist socialism, all major Western political parties, global finance, mainstream media, most of the internet, censorship regulations and the US first amendment...........
@PodunkPotato @KingOfWhiteAmerica @shortstories If white Americans acted the way Jews did and for the same reasons, we would have an empire that made queen Victoria sit in the corner drawing with crayons, but we let the idea of universal human equality and goodness take priority over the actual betterment of mankind, let alone the justice of God.
>You're twins, I'll poke one with a stick... Did you feel it?
Naur, I live in Argentina now.
Who believes this shit?

@KingOfWhiteAmerica @PodunkPotato

Either Mengela did not collect data or Mengela did unethical experiments

You can nit have it both ways

What happened to all the data if Mengela did all the experiments?

@PodunkPotato @shortstories Beyond that though - which is absolutely a valid observation - I think there’s ample evidence that any legitimate Scientific discovery made after the 1930s outside approved sources, and/or that failed to corroborate the established narrative (in whatever field), would be officially dismissed as “unscientific”

@Zergling_man

I am not because I do not understand it. If someone else understands it they could write it in simple English Wikipedia then send me a link

@shortstories What‘s going wrong is that physics died in the 1930s, and became ossified such that State interests always outweigh pure Scientific ones

The alchemy demons stopped telling them shit, or they refused to tell us what they say.

@KingOfWhiteAmerica @HatkeshiatorTND

Ok I was wrong about the claim that the product of two irrational numbers is always an irrational number

Can someone explain what they mean by an unvariant particle as opposed to a not unvariant particle in unparticle physics in simple language?

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unpartic

@HatkeshiatorTND

4/5 is a solution for the numerator but it is not a solution for the denominator and both the numerator and denominator must be rational in order for the numerator divided by the denominator to be rational

If Beta = 4/5 = 0.8

Then 1 - Beta^2 = 0.36

The square root of 0.36 = 0.6 which is a rational number

But
1 + Beta^2 = 16/25 + 25/25 = 41/25

The square root of 41/25 is not a rational number

The square root of a rational number times an irrational number is an irrational number

the recripical of an irrational number is an irrational number

the product of two irrational numbers is an irrational number

the product of two rational numbers is a rational number

So 4/5 does not work for Beta

Show thread
@shortstories we want
β :
i) β ∈ ℚ

ii) let r = √((1 - β²) ÷ (1 + β²)); r ∈ ℚ

iii) β ∈ (0,1) # assuming exclusive because the above holds trivially for both 0 and 1

suppose β = p ÷ q; q, p ∈ ℤ⁺, q > p

we have
r = √(((q² - p²) ÷ q²) ÷ ((q² + p²) ÷ q²)), to prove r ∈ ℚ

equivalently,
r = √((q² - p²) ÷ (q² + p²))

equivalently,
r = √(q² - p²) ÷ √(q² + p²)

i'm no mathematician but this feels like something with no rational solutions

Beta is a real number

0 < Beta < 1

F = square root of ( 1 - Beta Squared / ( 1 + Beta Squared ) )

Name at least one rational number value of Beta that gives me a rational number value for F

Equation for special relativity longitudinal doppler shift with object moving away at speed V where Beta = V / C

If my formula is wrong let me know

I want to find one or more numbers that are easy to use without a calculator for an examp!e problem or example problems

I will not give you credit

hello thank you for applying 2 years ago, we have decided not to hire you
Show older
Merovingian Club

A club for red-pilled exiles.