@37712 If people can't spot an AI image this obvious, then in a few years nobody will know what's real anymore.
And all the little errors in this picture could have been easily edited away by a human too, which makes me think this was created to paint conspiracy theorists as gullible buffoons who have an irrational hatred for Js.
@VooDooMedic @37712 It 100% IS AI. Why are you denying it? Even if you can't notice the finer details, at least compare the guy's t-shirt with the one from the actually real footage and you'll notice the letters as well as the logo are a sloppy approximation made by AI.
@Based_Accelerationist I agree, starting with u apparently
@VooDooMedic was right, no AI.
@37712 @VooDooMedic Oh, computer says no? Well, I guess my lying eyes are wrong then. Let's ignore the guy's shirt, his teeth, the woman's sunglasses, the shadows, the background objects/hands, that don't look AI generated at all.
This is what his shirt actually looks like. Do you people have eyes or not?
@Based_Accelerationist @37712 no blood on the bandages, no wound, apparently this guy got "shot" in the head holy fuck do YOU not have eyes! Where's the bullet wound, where's the blood flow, oh and of course I have enough time to take a selfie and then do a completely coherent interview on live TV with no stutter mental fog or obvious head injuries god you're retarded
@Based_Accelerationist @37712 maybe try not being a sperg and calling everything ai
@VooDooMedic @37712 That's a whole other conversation. I'm not claiming he isn't a crisis actor, he might be for all I know, which I said before when I first replied to your post. But the image in question is AI. If you can't separate facts from fiction, then you're not helping anyone.
And if I were you Voodoo, I would refrain from calling people retarded.
>not dismissing crisis actor
>dismissing the setup and SFX of the crisis actor
@VooDooMedic @37712 Do you not see how falling for an AI generated image will hurt the noticer's credibility and do exactly what a crisis actor would want?
Compare the shirts, it should be obvious, if you can't pick up on AI generated content, even though you generate a ton of it.
@VooDooMedic @37712
"The image was created by Google's artificial intelligence, which ABC NEWS Verify confirmed by testing it in the company's Synth ID detector tool, which checks for the company's invisible digital watermark."
Oh what's that? I'm proven right yet again! What a shock!
Are my eyes better than yours or is my brain just bigger? Any more of this and I'll become as deranged as TFM and believe myself to be the smartest person on the planet, smarter than even the elites!
@Based_Accelerationist @37712 ever think that the AI image was created to create a smoke screen for crisis actor narrative to be dismissed as just another hoax everything is smoke and mirrors
@VooDooMedic @37712 You mean exactly what I warned you about? https://merovingian.club/web/@Based_Accelerationist/115731147967947652
Yeah, I did think of that as a matter of fact. Did you?
Which is precisely WHY you aren't helping your credibility by vouching for the authenticity of a random image, even if it wasn't obviously AI generated. Think.
@Based_Accelerationist @37712 not ai