If the 1"9th ammendment was ratified in 1920
But the Federal Reserve Act was ratified in 1913 then
Women's right to vote is not the cause of the problem because something else happened before 1913 leading up to the federal reserve act
What was the cause of the federal reserve act?
What group of families benefited the most from the federal reserve act and what do those families have in common?
How were the campaigns for women's right to vote funded?
@shortstories Absolutely, women's empowerment is just a symptom of the problem.
TFM likes to say that everything is solved by taking women's rights away. And yes, that is true, except you can't take their rights away without the government going to war against you. And who controls the US government? Israel.
But Jewish supremacy is also a symptom, the disease are the weak men who enforce the tyranny and fight their wars.
The problem is the 99% and only a deadly global reset can solve that.
@shortstories Yes, voting is now pointless, but taking women's rights away means we would have gender roles and they'd leave the workplace. It would solve the birthrate problem and masculinize society (which is why it would NEVER be allowed to happen).
Now, would getting women out of the way be enough? No, we still have the weak men to deal with. Faith isn't the problem, weakness is. Few have faith in the US dollar/government/media but the weak love their golden cage, they're nothing without it.
@Based_Accelerationist
Taking away women's right to vote will not solve anything if the people who set up the fractional reserve banking system are still in charge
Taking away women's right to vote would just mean the media would rig the claim for how men voted if the media still gets to proclaim who won the election
The root problems are faith in media, faith in governments, faith in corporations, faith in clergy, faith in money
Out of all of these faith in media is the most dangerous