I honestly think atheism is inconsistent with the scientific method. What I mean by that is, what is atheism? It’s a statement, a categorical statement that expresses belief in nonbelief. “I don’t believe even though I have no evidence for or against, simply I don’t believe.” Period. It’s a declaration. But in science we don’t really do declarations. We say, “Okay, you can have a hypothesis, you have to have some evidence against or for that.”
@shortstories Here's one axiom: The universe exists and everything within it is changing.
We see and feel movement everyday if not just for us being living organisms. While Science is well suited to explain the movement of objects (i.e. Change), you're gonna have a tougher time working backwards to explain the Origin of Change.
That's where things become fucky: If the big bang theory turned out to be explainable by Science, then that's a finite event subjugated to Change too.
Red shift is caused by gravitational red shift and light red shifting as it travels through a medium and does not require a big bang doppler red shift in which all the stars are moving away from us to explain why it happens
💢 :jahy_rage: Angry Kyūkyoku Wraith 
:AngryGlitch: 
Peer reviewed.
SCIENCE IS REAL, BIGOTS! GO BACK TO YOUR FLAT TRANNY CHEST EARTH WAYS!
@shortstories why don't you believe in Zues? Odin? Ra? Or a thousand other gods, goddesses, spirits, and demons?
If you were born in India and raised as a Hindu, would you have chosen to become a Christian because of some "truth" found within Christianity instead of worshipping a six armed elephant?
Does Christianity even align with your values as a person? Are you merely conforming to a group? If you found out they were a Satanic cult, would that even bother you?
1 A god could exist and be a horrible sentient being by the moral standards most humans choose to judge. A god being unethical would not disprove the existence of a god.
2 Gary Habermas provided the best reason to believe Jesus rose from the dead based on historical documents that I have seen. There are reasons to believe in the Christian God described in the new testament if you believe in history. But I do not believe in history.
3 Agnosticism is more logical than Atheism
@shortstories I'm taking this from a previous video I mentionned:
The scope of Science is to explain to the best of our human abilities the phenomena we observe. Science cannot demonstrate the absence of existence of God or several gods since that's well beyond observable reality.
Also Science isn't all logical. To make deduction of cause and effect, there must be assumptions made as a starting point that bypass the need for empirical evidence. Axioms if you will.