@Twig Precisely. Francis has created the exact precise conditions wherein this circumstance would arise.
@Twig Yes, of course they are saying that. Francis absolutely saw to it they would.
@Twig @KingOfWhiteAmerica Francis was incorrect. The act of flight is neither moral nor immoral, and as such it is not incumbent upon another country to accept anyone for any reason or grant someone a right of passage into said country. The person in question is irrelevant from a moral perspective because flight as such is non-moral.
@Twig @reallyangry @DoubleD It is bad Christian witness to empower gangs of thugs to threaten your literal neighbors’ kids.
@Twig @KingOfWhiteAmerica @reallyangry I can't tell if someone disagreed with my point.
My follow-up question to the point about helping people is how do you define "help"? Is it giving someone a place to stay when they are a chronic bad decision-maker, or is it making someone suffer the consequences of their decisions?
What if literally closing the door on someone makes them realized how bad they've made their life, and gives them the initiative to truly repent?
@Twig @KingOfWhiteAmerica @reallyangry
There are many ways to answer the question of why I came to be.
Your response still doesn't answer my question in a universally applicable way because you've swapped "help" for "harm" and "good".
@Twig @KingOfWhiteAmerica @reallyangry I can be cheeky here and say He Who is the Way is the correct "way" to lead them. 😉
You're correct that most people, let alone modern progressives, don't desire to live near migrants, but it's perfectly reasonable that they don't wish to even though they espouse welcoming them into the country because their morality is to act for that which is in their own perceived self-interest. If that means virtue signalling they do it.
@Twig @KingOfWhiteAmerica @reallyangry Most people have an idealistic worldview based on the idea that behavior which conforms to their ethics should be rewarded, atheist or not. Also, many positive atheists still have a theological worldview, it is just missing God meaning they still believe in an absolute standard of right and wrong, but there is no supreme being to define it for them.
@Twig @KingOfWhiteAmerica @reallyangry To your question, about housing someone who wasn't a criminal or sacrificing materially for them, it would depend on the specific time, the specific conditions of their migration, the specific person with a specific background, the specific conditions of my financial situation, etc. I cannot say "I will do X for all cases" any more than I can buy iron bars as such. I have to buy a particular amount of iron bars for a particular price at a particular time.
@Twig @KingOfWhiteAmerica @reallyangry
I'm not being intentionally obtuse: I know what you mean in common parlance, but I want you to think about the subjective nature of what is beneficial and non-beneficial for people. Only God knows what is truly best for them. I would highly recommend reading "Who is the Rich Man That Shall Be Saved?" by St. Clement of Alexandria to grasp that I'm aiming for something below the surface-level interpretation.
Doubled, why did God make you?
Jesus said help the poor and disenfranchised but in that pursuit, if we endanger them and the public, then it does more harm than good, obviously unintended consequences of compassion.
I think HE would agree that it must be done in a responsible, disciplined way.