@Twig Precisely. Francis has created the exact precise conditions wherein this circumstance would arise.
@Twig Yes, of course they are saying that. Francis absolutely saw to it they would.
@Twig @KingOfWhiteAmerica Francis was incorrect. The act of flight is neither moral nor immoral, and as such it is not incumbent upon another country to accept anyone for any reason or grant someone a right of passage into said country. The person in question is irrelevant from a moral perspective because flight as such is non-moral.
@Twig @reallyangry @DoubleD It is bad Christian witness to empower gangs of thugs to threaten your literal neighbors’ kids.
@Twig @KingOfWhiteAmerica @reallyangry I can't tell if someone disagreed with my point.
My follow-up question to the point about helping people is how do you define "help"? Is it giving someone a place to stay when they are a chronic bad decision-maker, or is it making someone suffer the consequences of their decisions?
What if literally closing the door on someone makes them realized how bad they've made their life, and gives them the initiative to truly repent?
@Twig @KingOfWhiteAmerica @reallyangry
I'm not being intentionally obtuse: I know what you mean in common parlance, but I want you to think about the subjective nature of what is beneficial and non-beneficial for people. Only God knows what is truly best for them. I would highly recommend reading "Who is the Rich Man That Shall Be Saved?" by St. Clement of Alexandria to grasp that I'm aiming for something below the surface-level interpretation.
IMG_3677.jpeg