I'm investigating David Wilcock's videos before his death.
I didn't know he was talking about proving God scientifically and the reality of the Incarnation. I didn't know he was asking questions about Trump.
It's going to be a deep dive for me, as I try to suss out the truth out of implication. (I'm very good at this.)
"Autism powers, activate!"
Logic allows for different reasonable conclusions from the same data, even if you personally consider it unlikely.
This is what Plato and Socrates lacked when their listeners just sucked their dicks at every word -- they lacked anyone with thoroughness to say "No, there is another."
"Even the higher-iq of us are at times capable of great retardation." -RONIN GREY (on humility, self-awareness, and growth).
Yes, I quoted myself. I think I'll make myself a coffee mug with that quote on it.
Answers in Genesis pointed out how if two people have the same physical evidence but interpret it with a different worldview they will come to a different conclusion
I have noticed that some mainsream holocaust believers with academic credentials use the same evidence as people who believe in different history about the holocaust but people who believe in different history interpret the same evudence idifferently
Some mainsream academics admitted some evidence has been faked
@RoninGrey Dude, the guy was a paranormal believer. Obviously he would in time gravitate towards divinity... especially at the late stage of his life when he starts searching for the meaning through the lense of belief.
Every paranormal activity believer is a Christian waiting to convert. Because their minds rush to conclusions and skip the Occam's razor of obvious falacies to satisfy their personal romantic urges.
@RoninGrey Be thankful he's not a godless SOB like Stephen King who is a liberal to the bone with Democracy as his divinity... that led to his Trump meltdown in 2016... even though his mindless idealistic fanaticism was obvious back in 1979 when he published "The Stand" with it's obvious world-building problems.
@RoninGrey
Something being not true does not mean that it is false
Something being not false does not mean that it is true
Something can not be both false and not false at the same time when measured and or evaluated in the same way or with the same criteria
Something can not be both true and not true at the same time when measured and or evaluated in the same way or with the same criteria
Something can be logically falicious but still true
The fallacy fallacy is very important to learn