Based or more gynocentrism? Genuinely curious cause I think there’s a case for both.
@Pain66 - I think it all depends on the context. In a patriarchy, it would've been perfectly acceptable, and perhaps even based.
But under the current structure, it's a gynocentric setup that accomplishes nothing. That daughter is still going to fuck a sports team in one night, at some point before she graduates.
The father is attempting to maintain the illusion of control over his daughter, at the expense of a young lad's face. ➡️
@Pain66 - ➡️ I have a boy around that age, 🤔 and if it were him... Me and the girl's father would have a discussion.
But this is just matriarchy in action. It always returns a bitter harvest. The giveaway is that there were likely zero negative consequences for the daughter. No ass whipping there... and that is equally appropriate as hitting the lad.
The father greenlighted letting a horny boy into his horny daughter's bedroom.
By any account that is dumb as all hell. It effectively communicates to both kids "I'm basically OK with it, but I'll give you extra hoops to jump through. Wink."
This is the non-religious in a nutshell, stumbling from one parenting moral crisis to the next, and no clue as to why or why not X behavior is OK or not. Religious fathers wouldn't tolerate the scenario to begin with.
@UncleIroh @YoMomz @Pain66 If your daughter wants to fuck some boy trust me you can’t stop it,I have told both my ex wives and both my daughters I think,This…”It’s your pussy,you can do what you want with it,Hell,you could haul sand in it!And there would be nothing I could do about it.But you have to live with it the rest of your life,not me.”
