One of problems with heaven and hell.
If this concept existed so there must exist equivalent for opposite kind of people.
Where bad people are rewarded and good people punished.
Like thiefs would enjoy eternally stealing in their version of heaven.
Or killers would enjoy eternally killing people in their version of heaven.
@Stahesh The anti-heaven and the anti-hell. 😄
I am not sayng whether or not heaven & hell exist but your objection does not make sense
Heaven must have closed borders & a strict immigration policy to prevent people who like torturing other people from entering else heaven will become Hell
In Hell people who like to torture other people go. If they are allowed to meet people who like torturing other people they will suffer torture from other torturers or alternatively they will suffer through solitary confinement.
@shortstories @kaiservenom My point was. Why only goodness is rewarded.
Why there can't be similar concept where evilness is rewarded.
Which would question moral superiority of both good and evil.
Not how would it actually work.
Like why one side should be rewarded but the other punished.
So they would cancel each other.
California is undeniable proof that Hell exists whether or not there is a after life
@shortstories True.
Consequences do not care about morality.
And I would not care much about morality too.
@Stahesh @kaiservenom
It is not a matter of objective morality vs relative morality
There are the same physical consequences of a action no matter if someone judges the action as morally good or morally bad
As long as a after life exists & people have free will
whether or not (a) god(s) or karma exists to judge
People can not escape the consequences of their choices, a choice with no consequences is not a choice
People who habitually make certain choice patterns will torture themselves