NEW POLL
* Tradcons: "Our daughters and wives are morally superior, fragile virgins who get corrupted by wicked men."
* Evo-psych: "Women are choosy & hypergamous"
Well, dead bedrooms and sexless marriages are real.
So is widespread sport-fucking and dog-pilled OF whores.
I don't know which sex has the greater capacity for raw carnal lust & depravity, but which is more true?
I think that at different stages of life a male will answer the question differently:
A male hopes females are as sexual as said male sees them behaving online/in public/etc because he hopes he will get to taste that sexuality personally, but after he tries to lock a female down, he hopes that said female isn't as sexual as females often are.
I hope that makes sense.
Yeah I'd agree with that. It's not an eternal binary but different at diffrent stages.
@UncleIroh @DoubleD
Honest question: is there anything left to be discussed about women and female nature?
Having followed TFM for years, the subject has been beaten to death a long time ago. There's no benefit to even speculate anymore, i feel it's trying to fantasize depth to a shallow empty pool.
@Zeb @UncleIroh There are things in terms of human nature's effects upon society and on human relationships in the context of scientific research; for that there is no end.
In terms of simple explanation of redpill knowledge, we don't need to revisit old points.
> is there anything left to be discussed about women and female nature?
The answers to these 2 choices have differernt cultural consequences. Each option suggests that women's sexuality needs to be controlled but in slightly different ways.
Even with just 3 respondents so far in a corner of the internet which would seem radical to normiefags, there's already a difference of opinion.
@UncleIroh @DoubleD
True, but the choice is really limited by nature. Either you control women's female sexuality establishing patriarchy, or you let it all loose and they destroy your civilization causing extinction or an external conquest.
I see no other real solution for humanity, if they want to be a future advanced civilization, than straight up sex robots and artificial wombs.
@DoubleD @UncleIroh
You guys understand. I agree, we will have two societies: the ones where males fully embrace the technology and will either go into the stars or complete conquer the world and
the second gynocentric society where males will deal with meatbags, probably getting left behind or turned into a live zoo, like the bonobos.
@UncleIroh @Zeb To summarize: I agree that such futuristic technology is outside of natural evolution.
@UncleIroh @Zeb Even if we introduce artificial wombs and birth rates stabilize or even exceed replacement, societal advancement will still be retarded by female empowerment since the herd known as humanity will be letting the weaker half set the standards for what is acceptable. The artificial womb solution unless maintained over hundreds of thousands of years also does not change evolutionary psychology. Society will still be gynocentric because males will still find females desirable.