NEW POLL
* Tradcons: "Our daughters and wives are morally superior, fragile virgins who get corrupted by wicked men."
* Evo-psych: "Women are choosy & hypergamous"
Well, dead bedrooms and sexless marriages are real.
So is widespread sport-fucking and dog-pilled OF whores.
I don't know which sex has the greater capacity for raw carnal lust & depravity, but which is more true?
@UncleIroh An interesting question.
@UncleIroh I think most males know of but can't admit or acknowledge the truth about female nature--not with females' revealed preferences and habits on full display on social media and the internet.
Males have a stronger desire for sex, but females are more quick to cheat from what I've seen which includes what I've read of others' experience as well.
We're now a about decade on from dating apps, Only Fans and watching females of all ages go totally deranged over Instagram and TikTok.
I'm betting that if the data ever gets out, it would reveal they cheat more than men.
Also, just to note that Elon is sitting on a goldmine of behavioral data.
@UncleIroh TFM's analogy of calling the Special Olympics what it is is apt, I think. People wouldn't deny what you said--not if pressed. They'd call you an asshole because you made a female upset and males want their females to be happy.
The more I see of this world, the more I am convinced that delusion, whether self-inflicted or not, is a bane of success in endeavours: be it a business, a relationship, an experiment, or a civilization.
I think that at different stages of life a male will answer the question differently:
A male hopes females are as sexual as said male sees them behaving online/in public/etc because he hopes he will get to taste that sexuality personally, but after he tries to lock a female down, he hopes that said female isn't as sexual as females often are.
I hope that makes sense.
Yeah I'd agree with that. It's not an eternal binary but different at diffrent stages.
@UncleIroh @DoubleD
Honest question: is there anything left to be discussed about women and female nature?
Having followed TFM for years, the subject has been beaten to death a long time ago. There's no benefit to even speculate anymore, i feel it's trying to fantasize depth to a shallow empty pool.
@Zeb @UncleIroh There are things in terms of human nature's effects upon society and on human relationships in the context of scientific research; for that there is no end.
In terms of simple explanation of redpill knowledge, we don't need to revisit old points.
> is there anything left to be discussed about women and female nature?
The answers to these 2 choices have differernt cultural consequences. Each option suggests that women's sexuality needs to be controlled but in slightly different ways.
Even with just 3 respondents so far in a corner of the internet which would seem radical to normiefags, there's already a difference of opinion.
@UncleIroh @DoubleD
True, but the choice is really limited by nature. Either you control women's female sexuality establishing patriarchy, or you let it all loose and they destroy your civilization causing extinction or an external conquest.
I see no other real solution for humanity, if they want to be a future advanced civilization, than straight up sex robots and artificial wombs.
@UncleIroh @Zeb Even if we introduce artificial wombs and birth rates stabilize or even exceed replacement, societal advancement will still be retarded by female empowerment since the herd known as humanity will be letting the weaker half set the standards for what is acceptable. The artificial womb solution unless maintained over hundreds of thousands of years also does not change evolutionary psychology. Society will still be gynocentric because males will still find females desirable.
@DoubleD @UncleIroh
You guys understand. I agree, we will have two societies: the ones where males fully embrace the technology and will either go into the stars or complete conquer the world and
the second gynocentric society where males will deal with meatbags, probably getting left behind or turned into a live zoo, like the bonobos.
@UncleIroh @Zeb To summarize: I agree that such futuristic technology is outside of natural evolution.
the moment that desire turns outwards, men wish they were more reserved
@UncleIroh Women aren't corrupted by men, they're corrupted by the freedom to act on their own impulses unchecked. They aren't morally superior.
"Women are choosey & hypergamous" is self-evident.
Women's fertility window is much shorter than men's. They desire sex until they have kids or reach their 30s. But unlike men, they prefer quality over quantity. Then we have mentally damaged women who use sex as a coping mechanism, either due to trauma or because they can't handle being old (cougars)
@Based_Accelerationist @UncleIroh
As far as what men think, it goes back to AWALT. Men, generally, think they are good girls and bad girls. Men think they are whores and they are housewives.
Personally, I see girls as breeders. And if you let them be wild, they will breed willy nilly.
@redmaple @Based_Accelerationist
If there's one Iron Law in all this we can all rely on it's AWALT. That needs to be nailed to the wall.
+1 for using the phrase "willy nilly"
@UncleIroh Dead bedroom = bumping hotel room. The low libido woman is a lie. If she's not having sex with her husband, it's not because she's not having sex at all. She is cheating.
You just HAD to bring up the dog pill huh? 🤢
Anyway, to answer your question 95% if guys are blue 💊 AF.
Tradcons cope since they refuse to imagine their sweet little girl getting railed by random guys, and I get why.
Evopsych is true a macro sense.
Dead bedrooms exist because women marry for 💰.
Sportfucking is here to stay due to birth control, abortion etc.
In the end most men will bend to their instincts and take the deal no matter how bad it gets.
sad state of affairs
