@Mongoliaboo @UncleIroh @shortstories
While this is true you don't need to be a warrior necessarily to be a good leader.
You just need to be a free thinker and intellectually honest.
It doesn't take Hercules/Einstein TWRA, end welfare, limit the vote and get the gays out of here.
@basedbagel @Mongoliaboo @UncleIroh
To prevent homosexuals from voting,
you have to prevent Jews from voting
Jews teach
https://www.chabad.org/torah-texts/5458257/The-Talmud/Sanhedrin/Chapter-7/54b
Therefore, just as one who engages in intercourse actively is not liable if he is less than nine years old, as the intercourse of such a child does not have the halakhic status of intercourse, so too, if a child who is less than nine years old engages in homosexual intercourse passively, the one who engages in intercourse with him is not liable.
@shortstories @Mongoliaboo @UncleIroh
Homosexuality is not just taught, it's a life choice and a preferred lifestyle of satanic people and their damaged victims.
Jews aren't the only ones who can't leave these kids alone but this is a HARD line in the sand for me.
Anyone talking to kids about anything sexual gets eviscerated expeditiously jew or no jew.
@UncleIroh @shortstories @Mongoliaboo
You're right but its a heavy subject matter even for me.
I'd love to adress the trampant witchraft but again in a Godless country such as this they're not satanic, you're just not tolerant enough and still believe in fairy tales
@UncleIroh @shortstories @Mongoliaboo
They sure coudn't!
But let a man murder a baby for the crime of being inconvenient and they'll paint the prison walls with our internal organs
@basedbagel @shortstories @Mongoliaboo
The larger point is that if you use secularism and paganism to justify murdering babies, then you have no moral basis to refute "love is love" pedohilia, and you are incentivized to turn such acts into a pagan spiritual rite in order to justify it.
This is where we are.
@basedbagel @shortstories @Mongoliaboo
At that point, literal child sacrifice is just a sneeze away.
@UncleIroh @shortstories @Mongoliaboo
To me its all the same.
Impact > intent.
Idc if you killed the baby to keep your beach boy or sacrfice it to Molec.
You're a murderer and if there were any justice in this world they'd be treated like I was when I refused the vax.
I.e. Lose your job, Social ostracization
@basedbagel @shortstories @Mongoliaboo
> Impact > intent.
So Consequentialism then, an outcomes-based morality.
For me, that's a non-starter. Chrisitian deontological ethics is better.
@UncleIroh @shortstories @Mongoliaboo
"Chrisitian deontological ethics"
NGL had to google that but I agree with you.
But in this specific case if I find proof a baby is dead by someone's hands they better have a DAMN good explanation or
@basedbagel @shortstories @Mongoliaboo
@UncleIroh @shortstories @Mongoliaboo
"you have no moral basis to refute "love is love" pedohilia"
This is why I can't get behing subjective morality.
But for some reason only religious people see my view on this. I wonder why that is?
I don't have any peer-reviewed studies to debunk pedophilia but i do have a hockey masks and a special set of skills.
@basedbagel @shortstories @Mongoliaboo
We're not collectively ready to acknowlege it or have the conversation at all.
For one, a true redpilling would destroy too many women. They wouldn't be able to handle the accountability for what they've done.