Show newer

@Pain66 If the type of man that she wants to have as her future husband knows about her previously doing OnlyFans, he is not going to want her. So she will have to lie about her past, which would eventually become revealed.

I do not blame men who say they do not want to get married. Not if the women behave like this.

@deprecated_ii Must be someone's last name. God help any children who would be in school with name like that.

Therefore, the male equivalent of a slut is not merely a man that is too willing to give out his commitment to women in terms of being willing to enter a relationship, but being too easy to give away his resources to women. The man that gives money to OnlyFans models is far more fitting for that equivalency. Like a slut giving out sex too easily, the man who gives up his finances to women too easily is the true equivalent to a slut.

Show thread

Something occurred to me when the discussion of gatekeepers of sex came up on the "whatever" stream (not worth watching full through). The women were talking about "male sluts," showing that they do not understand the roles men and women play as gatekeepers. Women are the gatekeepers of sex, and men are the gatekeepers of commitment. But what is "commitment" in this context really? It is not really about being devoted to one in a relationship, but more about committing one's resources.

@lina @Repoast Perhaps you should look at the silliness that is “Planet Fitness”

They literally have pizza night, where members get to eat their fill of goyslop

they have the “lunk alarm” which is supposed to be hit to sound a blaring noise whenever you see someone “showing off”, lifting heavy weights, and grunting

It’s tailor-made to accommodate obese, insecure women and make them feel like they can workout, too. You could probably write a whole thesis about what you learn from modern america from Planet Fitness commercials alone

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZdNz38i4qnU&list=RDQMvSaxrbvcpwQ&start_radio=1

@Humpleupagus >Nigeria and Kenya have almost no bot activity

>very pro-Russian

Really makes you think...

@Pain66 Of course men stop them. They simply are not good enough to beat the men, thus they do not get past the qualifying rounds to be among the competitive players. Simple as.

@MasterSimper Did you make these yourself, or did you find them somewhere?

@WashedOutGundamPilot Given how many of our leaders are literal boomers, it is not going to shock me if they keep pushing for this retarded idea of war since they have no idea how many of the younger generation of men feel like this. They will soon discover their mistake if they actually push us all the way to full out war. At best, they will lose the conventional war and power themselves. At worse, we have a full on nuclear apocalypse.

@WashedOutGundamPilot Off the topic of the sexual marketplace, how many men do not something else to motivate them? Dead end jobs, no ownership of a home or land, no sense of community. You do not even need any men to be incompliant during a war to have disastrous results. And when you have many men who actually want to tear down the system, what is stopping them from just killing their commanding officers instead of fighting "the enemy?"

@WashedOutGundamPilot So many young man do not have even a steady sweetheart, much less a family to care about. So many young men lose out in the sexual marketplace that they have resigned themselves to not try and participate.

If you want these very men you need to be effective fighters in a war, you need to give them something to motivate them. And yes, sexual success (be it as significant as marriage or as cheap as casual sex) is an important motivator. Too many men just don't have this.

@WashedOutGundamPilot And to think that the US is thinking they can go to war with Russia and China under these conditions. With all the apathy from the younger generations of men, do you think they are going to jump to the call to go fight for a system they do not feel they have a real stake in?

This is far different than how things were in the 1940s. Even if you force every man to fight, too many of them are going to ask the question, "What is the point?"

When you see the idea that a lot of current-day society regarding men is basically a ham-fisted attempt to keep the lid on a boiling pot it makes sense.

-Normalize masturbation

Normalize weed consumption as a daily ritual
Destroy healthy eating patterns
Demonize functional health (peacocking fitness marginally accepted)
Enact systems that separate men from their families in order to pursue gainful employment
Normalize moving jobs in order to advance (prevents team/community building that threatens your power)
Normalize pointless sex with strangers
Normalize absentee fathers as the standard (their sons will be raised in the cult by the state and gullible conformist moms)
Convince the world that men only show interest in mentorship and teaching children when they want to rape them (no more replacement father figures for the bastard sons)
Surround boys from birth with a cult of feminine operation. Ensure they’re programmed with female social code and mores so that they behave like women in their group dynamics and socialization (keeps them seeking approval from the consensus)

(did this post without @ him so his mentions don’t get hammered in case this becomes its own thread)

@Humpleupagus Jonathan, you just don't get it! When Iran says they want "Death to Israel," they don't mean they want Israelis to die, but the idea of Israel. They just want to destroy Israeliness! It is just like how your people say that they want to destroy whiteness! Which apparently does not mean getting rid of white people, even though the same people wanting to "get rid of whiteness" also seem to want white people erased from existence as well.

I have a feeling this guy would not be a fan of NotJustBikes.

If people could be responsible for themselves, no government would be necessary.

If people require government to be responsible for them, they will be ruled by those made responsible.

You cannot elect a government to be responsible for the people, while the people retain their authority. That is why democracy is a joke, and why it can only be maintained via deceit and illusion.

Responsibility and authority go together. To sever the two is to invite destruction and tyranny in equal measure.

Recently found out about a channel called "whatever" on youtube. Similar to the style of Fresh and Fit. I can save everyone a lot of time summarizing how the conversations usually go.

Brian: In general, women want a guy who is more dominant.

One or more of the women guests: No, no, I and one other friend I have totally like guys who are more the submissive type.

Even if such statements are truthful (doubt is heavy here), the guest always treat exceptions like they are equal to the norms.

@furgar

Should have spent more.

His "vacation" means "time when he does not have to account for who he meets."

Show older
Merovingian Club

A club for red-pilled exiles.