Show newer

Another day doing recon on lefty propaganda with NPR, they bring on a guest who talks about the "PTSD many Europeans had about the Trump presidency." If there are any Europeans or anyone who has PTSD from this, I really don't care and you can get it again for all I care if Trump "wins" (gets selected to win).

Trump hardly did that much, as he was a disappointment at best. Any trauma or fear about him being President was self inflicted. You are either a woman or a low-T male if you are afraid.

@TrevorGoodchild @WashedOutGundamPilot another factor to consider is that fertility is a dont use it you lose it kind of thing. if a woman had a couple kids by the time she is thirty chances are she is still ready to go for more but if she had no kids then she might be infertile by that point. especially if she was on the cock carasoal and pills in her twenties

While I suspect many immigrant groups will go back to their country if origin when circumstances get worse, those that remain will have to choose how to respond to violence. Most I assume will organize along ethnic groups to protect themselves. But it will not be them versus whites across the board, but rather them versus anyone within proximity to them.

We saw this response with Roof Koreans in the LA riots and Muslims in Dearborn during BLM riots. So it is most likely to happen that way again

Show thread

Will these additional factors make things worse during a collapse? Maybe. There is going to be conflict and violence when the decline progresses, though I am not sure that having more groups of populations will mean we will be uniquely worse off. Contrary to the existing anti-white sentiments that are present in many groups, most other groups of people do not get along with each other.

But that is just human nature. We are naturally in group focused. Only propaganda keeps whites away from this.

Show thread

When it comes to the coming collapse of many (currently) majority white countries, I see the USA in a unique situation than many other countries. Not due to the ratio of whites to non-whites or birth rates, but the number of categories of backgrounds of the groups. Most countries have their African, Indian, Middle East, and East Asian populations. But the USA has all of these plus the black population here since slavery and Hispanic population coming in from the south.

Perhaps history for kids that age would not have been all that substantial, but anything would be better than "what is a family for" class. Kids should already know that, and if they don't know about that already, the class is not going to be of any help to them as the school cannot and should not be a substitute for the family that should be at home.

And I am sure that "social studies" has gotten even worse since I have been in school, with all the gay shit going on and other propaganda.

Show thread

I learned something recently about how "Social Studies" came to be a thing. Apparently, the government was trying to make up for all the damage that was being done with the destruction of the family. So thanks to one problem created by our government, we now have a mind numbing and pointless class called "Social Studies."

I would have much preferred we just had real subjects like history instead. Even in Kindergarten and 1st grade I realized that Social Studies sucked, but now I know why.

So what's next with Trump getting felony convictions? This does not play well into the theory of the powers that be letting Trump back into the White House, unless I am missing something. Because I don't see how going with another 4 years of Biden is going to be a great idea with how things are shaking up in the world.

Perhaps those who are in charge are stupid enough to think they can succeed in spite of the bad conditions (such as low recruitment numbers for the military).

Perhaps you cannot always find the cheaper alternative with all things nor does it always work out for the better. But chances are that you might be spending more money than you need to on factors that are actually not important.

Show thread

With this in mind, consider what other things you can do to lower your expenses by seeking less expensive alternatives. Is your money being well spent by paying for all the added costs that have little to do with the end product itself?

While eating out is far from frugal, it makes little sense to pay extra for someone from Uber Eats or whatever other service when eating takeout is already expensive enough. Better yet, figure out if you can make the food yourself. Much cheaper.

Show thread

Giving another shout-out to ALDI. If you have one in your area, you should totally take advantage of the signficantly lower food prices. Who cares about things like name brands and customer service? At the prices they have, I care little that I have to bag my own groceries and return the cart myself to get the quarter back.

With food being a large expense, it helps to find ways to get it as cheap as possible.

Looks like someone made a call to Nikki. Yet another stop pulled to get Trump back in office so that can try to get more young white men to die for Israel.

@c the problem is that we don't really know how many of them have, because they've all been on team "anti-slut shaming" so they have just all been suspect.

The powers want more of it so they put show on tv that show lots of it .. but I think a lot of women still don't actually like doing that, and for a large percentage serial monogamy is the worst they have done.

But even with that, the problem is that the "don't let your wife have a divorced friend" thing - someone who looks to sabotage the relationship. And all of culture is that right now.

>90% top marginal tax rate for the rich

Except none of the rich actually paid that and always got out of it with loopholes built into the system. And most billionaires are not making a standard income like others, making a high income tax for them meaningless anyways.

Show older
Merovingian Club

A club for red-pilled exiles.