Show newer

Charlie Kirk was by no means extreme in his viewpoints, regardless of what is said about him from those on the left. For many of them, anyone moderately right wing is considered a hard core right wing extremist. So I do not think that they will be convinced that Charlie Kirk being killed will bring about an even further right wing figure. Because they are all Evil Fascist Nazi's in their eyes.

Show thread

I know there were voices on the left that spoke out against him being killed and condemned anyone taking joy in his death, though we cannot know for sure whether or not this is geniune or simply performative. From a public eye standpoint, it makes sense to condemn violent extremism regardless of your personal feelings. And in a way, even if you are just putting on a performance, it does show you to be truly different from those who publicly celebrate his death.

Show thread

The reactions of many on the left in various social media platforms is no surprise either. There were plenty of gleeful posts that are glad he is dead, though it comes off as far more spiteful since he was murdered at a very young age rather than someone who died old and with health problems, such as Rush Limbaugh.

Show thread

I had a very cautious opinion Charlie Kirk. My impression of him being such a prominent figure on the right was the equivalent of the high school quarterback who just so happened to be the son of the team's coach. That is, I am not entirely sure that he got such prominence based solely on his merits. And it might be the case that the son of the coach shows some competency and plays well as the quarterback. And I could say the same about Charlie Kirk, as he has remained influential on the right.

Hey 👋 so umm politics guy here☝️🤓

Just dropping in 💧 to let you guys know ✍️ that it doesn't matter what your opinion of Charlie Kirk is 🤔 all the people gloating about his murder 💀 on social media 💭 hate white people 👨‍👩‍👦 and want you dead too 😱

Hope this helps ✨️

The reason why white people are not rioting over the death of the Ukranian woman killed by a black man is due to the fact the white people who are angry about this have something to lose if they riot. The whites who engaged in riots for leftist causes did so because they had nothing to lose themselves, just like many blacks who riot have nothing to lose.

Going all in with just 10 dollars is a lot different than going all in with 10,000 dollars.

While I find certain aspects of accessing content such as games, shows and movies to be an annoyance when they are exclusively locked to different platforms, I do not agree with the complainers who seem to think that it is a violation of their rights that they have to pay for additional platforms in order to have access to everything.

Last I checked, video games, movies, and shows are not necessities. Complaints about this being some moral wrong shows that you have it pretty easy in life.

Women have a seriously rude awakening in store for them :smiley_bloodshot: they think they can be these slutty floozies during their prime fertile years and then settle down in their late 30s when they hit their wall and lost sexual market value. They don't understand how unbelievably important it is to marry and start having kids while you're YOUNG. Need to bring back arranged marriages because these hoes are just breeding a bunch of annoying dysgenics anyway. They have the sensibilities of niggers "if it feels good that means HAPPY! Horny means LOVE!"

The author was a woman too, and obviously writing for other women. And she knew her audience well.

Meanwhile, men did not care for Twilight. Which is to be expected, since it was not made for us. But the reason I bring this up is to demonstrate that it is not "the patriarchy" or any males who are responsible for the creation or popularity of this series among females. They chose to read and watch it, and any males who also watched were either gay or watched with their girlfriends.

Show thread

The constant pushing for the "girlboss" archetype in movies is a poor choice not only because it does not resonate with male fans, but also female fans. I remember when I was in high school the most popular book/movies among the girls was Twilight. The main character Bella was the most passive character you could have, the opposite of a girlboss.

But the female audience loved it. Sure, it is just one example, but it is the perfect counter example against the girlboss propaganda being pushed.

It's funny how leftists think you measure "freedom" and "power" and "history" by how easy and accessible consequence-free sodomy is

First they went after the White people and I did nothing because I was not White and then I starved to death because there was no one doing stuff to ensure I had food left

If anything would disprove George Orwell's idea of Newspeak being an effective tool to prevent ideas from being expressed, it is the people on youtube using every annoying term to get around demonetization.

I find it annoying when I hear the term "unaliving" instead of suicide. Everyone knows what they mean, it just makes you have to jump through more hoops while everyone knows the real word they mean.

Annoying as it is, I am fine with less parts of 1984 being able to happen.

> "Save" = Spend it on other shit we don't want either.
Oh BOY, we got a follow-up from JD Hall about Protestia's dumb little engagement slop stunt.
https://protestia.com/2025/08/07/redeemed-whores-pride...

To the young men he says:
"DO NOT MOCK REDEMPTION
To the young men reading this, I say this: the world is broken, but your calling has not changed. You were not made to be a permanent bachelor. You were not made to sit behind a screen, waiting for a unicorn to descend from heaven. You were made to lead, to love, to marry, to father. And that means you may one day meet a woman whose past makes you pause. Ask the right questions. Use discernment. But if she is in Christ, if she walks in holiness, if she hates her past and clings to the blood of Jesus, then do not let your fear of man outweigh your fear of God. Do not let pseudo-science about “pair bonding” override your theology. That junk theory was cooked up by the same culture that made purity into a performance and turned virginity into currency. It is not truth. It is not Scripture. It is not Gospel.
You believe in a God who heals the blind, raises the dead, and calls sinners His bride. You believe in a Spirit who transforms hearts and rewrites stories. You believe in a Savior who bled out not just to forgive you, but to cleanse your future wife. Do not pretend to hold to that Gospel and then treat her like used merchandise. That is hypocrisy. That is cruelty. That is unbelief."

To the young women he writes:
"YOUR SHAME IS NOT YOUR NAME
To the young women reading this, hear me: you are not damaged goods. You are not second-class. You are not too far gone. If you are in Christ, then you are a new creation. Not a repaired version of your old self. A new self. A holy self. A beloved daughter of the King. Your past is not your name. Your shame is not your identity. The blood of Christ did not leave part of you unwashed. It did not leave one corner of your story untouched. He took all of it. He paid all of it. And now you are His.
Do not listen to the voices who sneer behind their screens, calling you names that Christ has erased. Do not be defined by those who judge what God has justified. They are not your judge. They are not your groom. The one who loves you rightly will love you because of grace, not in spite of it. The man God is preparing for you will not treat you like a rescue mission. He will treat you like a gift. He will not idolize your past or ignore it, but he will honor the blood that washed it away."

You hear that, young men?
From JD Hall, you have responsibilities! You will have no attaboys from him for keeping your purity while the women didn't. You will get no rewards. And sure, he says you don't have to lower your standards, but you need to be realistic (which means lowering your standards) so you can man up and marry these women!

Meanwhile, to the young women who engaged in all this sexual sin, what does he say? Ah, ladies, you have no responsibilities whatsoever here except to expect the absolute best from God as He personally delivers a great man to you. You are a princess who is entitled to the cream of the crop among Christian men.

No advice for these women to show fruits in keeping with repentance. No encouragement for these men that God will make everything right for them. No, see, all the reward goes to the girls because they're the truly beloved ones - men are just slaves in this situation.
Dalrock would have had a field day with this one showing how deeply feminism has nestled itself into Hall's soul.
Show older
Merovingian Club

A club for red-pilled exiles.