KhaosKlub @[email protected]

@37712 @dander

if a 15 year old boy really wants to buy cigarettes, and he does look his age, but entices an adult with enough money. he wanted it and he got it.

who is in the wrong here?

technically both the adult selling him cigerettes and the boy buying cigerettes. the law punishes the adult though, not the boy. I think the parents would be in charge of punishing the boy

@37712 @dander
if one is attracted to a girl who looks 21, because she looks 21, then it's not pedo, but may be illegal depending on her age.

if one is attracted to a 21 year old that looks 15, then that might be a different story. hard to say what "looks 15" means.

@houseoftolstoy
the journalists just understand that their audience is retarded

@37712 @dander no, if one is fully sexually developed, then def not.

but, the law requires some sort of metric beyond "are they fully sexually developed".

at what age is a person fully sexually developed? yes, girls develop earlier in life, but the egalitarians won't have a law like that differing between male and female, so it is written for when both ought to be fully developed.

@basedbagel women are also both cowards, and afraid of everything. the big problem with this is that while it might not lead to them getting into as many accidents, it causes more accidents around themselves, as people dealing with them have to drive riskier or will develop road rage

@Omnissiah trying to reason with children

@spectre some like it hot

@spectre why?

@basedbagel you are the perfect shape for dickriding 🤣

@mutageno
and their parent company, proctor and gamble

midov is down?