There used to be a multiple section youtube channel by someone who I thought was called soylent Jeremy or soylent Jeremiah
He went through topics about different time periods in Biblical history compared to Anarcho Capitalism, he also conpared it with different sections of the Bible like Romans 13 & different topics like the non aggression principle
He believed the non aggression principle was taught in Christianity & so Christianity taught anarcho capitalism.
Can not find it now
The economics in the old testament were distributist but not statist communism
Certain families were given specific plots of land
This enabled everyone to have access to the means to produce their own wealth
But goods and services could be traded for and stealing & thus taxation was forbidden
Tithe was collected to help poor & religious duty obligated family lines but not enforced with violence
Poor could collect food from the edges of family plots but not deep inside
In the Bible NT no absolute was established to know who owns what property unlike the family land plots in the OT
Maybe this was a matter of valuing life more than objective property & trying to outreach to all people in the world with a message against stealing, non defensive use of force & worship of & blind obedience of government authority figures which were literally called gods in the day
Maybe as a means to survival obedience when reasonable was encouraged
I think you accidentally replied to the wrong post when talking about internet, electronic, software, hardware things
This was originally a post about politics and religion about Christianity and Nationalism or the video or the person in the video unless they mention those things in the video
@shortstories @gvs @charliebrownau
Yup, wrong thread asshats. But also interesting. Made a separate reply, now get off my lawn fuckers.
@UncleIroh @gvs @charliebrownau
I think that they are "Catholic" is highly problematic. I want to see a debate between pro polygyny Christians vs MGTOW
@UncleIroh
The old testament taught nationalism having clear boundaries giving land to certain people groups that did not belong to the Israelites
The old testament was anarchistic they had no senate or congress vote on laws but the laws were made as a formal agreement by all the "men" and the God who talked to Moses as a mediator, the selection of a King was dissaproved of by God but permitted
Taxation in the form of tithes was optional no human agent would use force to collect tithes