shortstories @[email protected]

@ChristiJunior @mitchconner @ArdainianRight

Sex Offenders is more specific language

They did not just have thoughts

They actually went out of the way to do physical action to harm people

Like trying to use fraud , violence or threats of violence to persuade people to castrate other people who they deceived into thinking they were getting a different surgical operation

Male or Female -> He, Him, His

Female only -> She, her, her

Mailman, fireman, policeman, man, men, mankind -> Male or Female

Woman, Women -> Female only

English language defaults to letting women enter male spaces but excluding males from female only spaces

We should get rid of grammatical gender from words

We should just insert male or female to refer to biological gender as needed

Otherwise the language will encourage women invading male only spaces being acceptable in people's minds

@VeganMGTOW @Based_Accelerationist @Zeb

I should have said new buildings instead of real buildings

In the past in English "he" or "him" could mean a male or female

But "she" or "her" could only mean a female

There was no pronoun that included males while excluding females in English until feminists started complaining about the use of "he" or "him"

Is Females being able to enter male spaces but males being forbidden to enter female spaces a default assumption in English grammar because there is a grammatical way to exclude males but no easy grammatical way to exclude females with pronouns?

"Originally the term Hebrew had nothing to do with race or ethnic origin. It derived from Habiru, a variant spelling of Ḫapiru (Apiru)"

"The term Habiru, meaning “Outsiders,” was applied to nomads, fugitives, bandits, and workers of inferior status; the word is etymologically related t"

Brittannica Hapiru

https://www.britannica.com/topic/Hapiru

https://web.archive.org/web/20150729005644/https://www.britannica.com/topic/Hapiru

Are Hebrews Bandits?

"ʿApiru "

"is a term used in 2nd-millennium BCE texts throughout the Fertile Crescent for a social status of people who were variously described as rebels, outlaws, raiders, mercenaries, bowmen, servants, slaves, and laborers.[1][2][3][4][5][6]"

"A considerable possibility remains that the beginnings of the Israelite history are bound with the wandering Apiru.[73] The Bible might have preserved a vague memory that the Patriarchs had once been Apiru.[74][75][76][77]"

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/%CA%BFApiru

@PeachySummer @leespringfield1903 @Shlomo

Pharaoh expels Abram

Genesis 12:18-20 NIV

18 So Pharaoh summoned Abram. “What have you done to me?” he said. “Why didn’t you tell me she was your wife? 19 Why did you say, ‘She is my sister,’ so that I took her to be my wife? Now then, here is your wife. Take her and go!” 20 Then Pharaoh gave orders about Abram to his men, and they sent him on his way, with his wife and everything he had.

https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=genesis%2012&version=NIV

@PeachySummer @leespringfield1903 @Shlomo

"was this the jews first recorded expulsion?"

In Genesis

When Abram gave his wife to another man but did not tell him that she was his wife

If you count Abram as a Jew even though technically he was the great grandfather of Judah

Abram = Abraham

@PeachySummer @Shlomo

"Wait. I didn't even read it right.
I'm gonna go kill myself"

Do not kill yourself

@PeachySummer @Shlomo

If Muhammnad existed then

If Jews treated Muhammad better then none of this alleged war would have happened

Jews are not being unjustly persecuted on a massive scale

@Shlomo

Jews might want to destroy the dome of the rock as part of a plan to rebuild the so called Jewish temple

This might be a Jewish attack not a Muslim attack

@Shlomo

The so called site of the Jewish temple is actually a Roman Fortress according to some people

In Mark 13 it states not one brick will stand on another

In other words if Mark 13 was fullfilled when the temple was destroyed in 70 AD there could be no wailing wall with bricks standing on top of other bricks

Another contradiction in what most Zionist so called Christians teach

I am not saying whether or not the Bible is true

But that if it is true then "Christian" zionism is false