Show newer

Someone posted how they made a mistake blocking everyone who has even slightly right wing values

I think that same person blocked me, just as I started reading their post suddenly I could not see any of their posts

@Indignation

The best part is where they use the hispanic looking guy who makes up the story about inventing it for profits

@Eiregoat @Jonaschuzzlewit @FemaleIsNotAFeeling nah, they're looking for a specific gene sequence; targeted diseases are a pipe dream.
I can think of two major reasons: Bioweapons and tracking. They already have a criminal DNA database and they love it, so convincing civilians to do it is an obvious next step.
They did that as a govt funded experiment to develop bio weapons and ID / Classify citizens. Or so I think
1. Yes, me too, glad my data isn't in there. If there were a similar service that reliably nuked your data after you're done with it I'd love to do it, but none of them are.

2. Imagine having ~1 million pissed off kikes lawyering after you. I can't imagine a more vicious court case.

@FemaleIsNotAFeeling

There are plenty of disabled people that like to make fun of other disabled people

This is a oversimplification but everyone likes everyone else being made fun of except themselves

I'm remembering an interaction with a male ex-friend who went trans during our friendship. He invited me over to swim and I was on my period, so I was going to have to postpone.

I was trying to think of a way to tell him I'm on my period in a non-offensive way, since he'd already come out "as a woman" (I know, I know...but I wasn't a Terf then). And I said something like "I'm gunna have to swim next week, because...err...it's like 'that time'" or something vague like that. Trying to hint and get the point across.

He got seriously offended. He was like, you're on your period?? Why do you feel like you have to hide that or that you can't say that to me? Like I'm not a woman and can't handle it?!"

And in my head I was like uh-oh...I'm in trouble now and then replied with kind of nervous laughter, like "oh, heh heh...I wasn't trying to hide it or afraid to say it, because you're trans or anything...I'm just....really shy and not used to talking about it to anyone!" And he was like well ok then.

But it always kinda stuck with me. I was afraid to bluntly talk about my period in front of a man, who had no idea what a period was like, because I don't really bluntly talk about my period openly to any man. And honestly, I was trying in my best attempts besides that to be considerate of him, because I thought talking about it might hurt his feelings! Like it might make him feel like "less of a woman" not having access to that.

And so it's like, no matter what, I couldn't do the right thing. I tried to be polite, but still showed that I wasn't reacting like I would if he was a real woman. I wasn't affirming his identity in the way I tried to inform him that I was on my period. I was tripping all over myself trying to make him feel comfortable and only made it worse. And this was me acting as a trans ally.

They are very militant with this stuff. I'd known this guy for years and had never felt this awkward with him before or more fearful that we'd entered a conflict that could end our friendship. I was walking on eggshells and just absolutely terrified of accidentally reminding this man that he was in fact, a man.

I'm so glad that I am free from that self-censorship and mental oppression right now. I never want to go back to that place. "I'm fucking bleeding from my vagina for a week. Deal with it, dude." Goddess that feels good to say.

@FemaleIsNotAFeeling

There is no clear consistent distinction because some psychologists classify them as the same thing but a social path is better at or prefers to manipulate groups of people to achieve goals and tends to be more charismatic than a psychopath or in other words has better social skills or prefers to be in social situations more than a psychopath.

A sociopath is more social than a psychopath

Is this post getting trolled by fediverse instances I have blocked? There's 1 quote repost I can't see and 2 like reactions I can't see...
Show thread
@Bobbins

One of my favorite subjects to study is patriarchy in all forms, through the lens of different locations across the globe. Patriarchy around the world has different intensities and nuances when manifested through different cultures, but one thing always remains the same everywhere Patriarchy is found:

Patriarchy was designed by males, for males (largely guided and inspired by Abrahamic religions) and through this system, males find exclusive privileges afforded to them by it. This social system also guarantees that males will be the exclusive gatekeepers to all positions of power within patriarchal societies and it also ensures that that power stays in and is passed down the male bloodline.

The word "Patriarchy" literally translates to: "The rule of the father."

The Merriam Webster definition of Patriarchy is:
"The social organization marked by the supremacy of the father in the clan or family, the legal dependence of wives and children, and the reckoning of descent and inheritance in the male line." 

It is clear that in Patriarchal societies, no matter how it gets interpreted or manifested, (whether it's men in suits or men in dresses oppressing women) the end game is still the same: Men will be oppressing women. Patriarchy is a self-sustaining system and Patriarchy will always find new ways to oppress women in order to maintain itself. Just like people and societies in general change and reform in order to keep up with the times, so does Patriarchy.

The whole Trans thing is actually pretty brilliant in its tactical effectiveness to completely invalidate feminism and women's rights as they stand...because Trans ideology seeks to completely erase biological sex - which is the very foundation on which feminist theory is based on in the first place.

Check it: Patriarchy 1.0 was the birth of patriarchal civilizations across the globe and the systemic oppression of women on the basis of our biological sex. In part, based on our exclusive ability to create life and to give birth to males for the patriarchy, so that men could continue to carry on and pass down social inheritance and power down their bloodlines. (again revisit the definition of Patriarchy to really drive this home).

Women collectively throughout time rose up and rebelled against patriarchal oppression on the basis of our sex and started to defeat it by gaining the right to vote, creating female-only spaces, and obtaining all sub sequential rights thereafter: (the right to work, to own a business, a home, a bank account, to have legal rights to our kids, to have representation in government etc). With those changes and the empowerment of female sex-based protections and rights, Patriarchy 1.0 started slipping.

And then along came Patriarchy 2.0, where men just straight up became women all together, deemed themselves the real oppressed victims, and labelled women the real patriarchal oppressors. Then they topped it off, by redefining the word "Woman" (once known as Adult human female) to: "Anyone who identifies as a woman." 

And poof! Female sex based protections, rights, and spaces are instantly erased. Women now simultaneously exist as both anything and nothing at the same time. A man is a woman if he says so and may therefore appropriate all female spaces and protections and if women object - we get ostracized, lose our jobs, our friends, get threatened with rape, death etc. Patriarchy 2.0 is like the coup d'é·tat to feminism and the fight for the maintenance and continuation of women's sex based protections and rights. 


@Avapark
Show older
Merovingian Club

A club for red-pilled exiles.