shortstories @[email protected]

MAGA tells AIPAC and Netanyahu to GTFO

The Young Turks

Youtube

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=LTQP3eFFZK8

Top oil analyst guarantees that the next few months ‘will be an ongoing, absolute disaster’ even if the Strait of Hormuz opens tomorrow.
https://fortune.com/2026/04/24/oil-market-forecast-disaster-crude-prices-strait-of-hormuz-opens-now-us-iran-war/

American Farm Bureau Federation survey finds 70% of U.S. farmers say they can't afford the fertilizer they need for this year's growing season. They plan to reduce their crop size to compensate.

@NoDoxGregBrady @BarelyEagle @TrevorGoodchild @judgedread that’s the likeliest answer

I very much doubt that Grand Hebrew Station is going to be built in Washington DC; it’s going to be on the Temple Mount, the only question is if they feel froggy enough to pull the trigger on bulldozing the mosque and going for it, and so far that hasn’t been the case

I recall there were some noises about them already having shipped to Israel the red heifers for the cow-sorcery ritual to make the satanic jew potion they needed to consecrate their new temple to Ba’al, but haven’t heard anything since then; that’s one of those sorts of things that when it happens, it’s gonna happen real quick-like, they won’t drag that out at all and they are going to be insufferably triumphant about it

they will, in fact, activate all of their Evangelical support base, who will be thrilled at what they see as the final gateway to being Raptured up into the sky with Jesus; that’s how you’ll know, every boomer and every member of the congregation of Pastor Jim’s Bible Church will be posting all over Facebook about how the time of glory is at hand

Just another reason to oppose the data center take over of America.

Read More: https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/data-centers-increasing-source-air-190600489.html

Support my work: https://linktr.ee/Jebassler

EBT Users NOT HAPPY About Florida's New Rule.
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/MHIFvWwF9Ow

Left Brain you see a cat, right Brain you see a dog. Which one do you see?
#minds

Holy fucking hell! This shitty study was paid for by BioNTech, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Gilead Sciences, Eli Lilly, etc.

What the fuck @jeffcliff - did you not read the actual study?

Conflict of interest

CS reports personal fees from BioNTech within the submitted work and grants, personal fees from AstraZeneca, personal fees and non-financial support from B Braun Melsungen, grants, personal fees and non-financial support from Gilead Sciences, grants and personal fees from Janssen-Cilag, personal fees from Eli Lilly, personal fees from Formycon, personal fees from Pfizer, personal fees from Roche, other from Apeiron, grants and personal fees from MSD, grants from Cepheid, personal fees from GSK, personal fees from Molecular partners, personal fees from Pfizer, other from Eli Lilly, personal fees from SOBI during the conduct of the study; personal fees from AbbVie, personal fees from MSD, personal fees from Synairgen, personal fees from Shionogi, grants and personal fees from ViiV Healthcare, outside the submitted work.CL reports receiving grants from Gilead, receiving advisory fees from ViiV, Pfizer, Novartis, BioNTech, Merck Sharp and Dohme, and Gilead, and receiving non-financial support from Gilead outside the submitted work.The disclosed interests are reflected in the authors’ affiliations. For transparency, SM holds shares in GIPAM, which conducted work in this study funded by BioNTech, and AS and JK are employees of BioNTech, which funded the study. JY is an employee of Pfizer Inc., which is involved in COVID-19 vaccine development. No other authors have any conflicts of interest or relationships that could be perceived as such in relation to this work.

Funding statementGo to section...

ROUTINE-COV19 is funded by BioNTech Europe GmbH. Employees of the funder contributed to the study design and manuscript review. Data analysis and interpretation were conducted independently by the authors.

so...in the data collected, vaccinated died way more but were way older...but then in the matched data it looks the same

I am incredibly confused - can you actually show the math behind your claim here

moreover, I cannot figure out what the actual time span of this data is or if it has any flaws (I grow suspicious when the data excludes uninsured people and people who lost insurance during the covered study)

the abstract rings alarm bells with incredibly imprecise language (it says "All-cause mortality was 25% lower among COVID-19-vaccinated individuals (HR: 0.76; 95% CI: 0.70–0.82)." yet its own table show that vaccinated had massively higher all cause mortality because of age differences - if these results are limited to certain cohorts (I couldn't tell because their methodology was a word soup) then it tells nothing about out of cohort effect)

if you want to do the work of taking this data and study and showing how it applies to people between say 18-45 then cool, but I cannot even figure out what they were comparing here

if the vax helps the matched vaxed cohort at age 72 I don't really care because I am not 72 - I would also want racial data because Germany has had a huge influx of foreign niggers that could massively skew the results either way

https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1895540528401879040