Show newer

Mythbusters testing how you can and can not escape a sinking car under water

m.youtube.com/watch?v=PSMXlkmH

Mythbusters test if people can escape being buried in dry sand vs wet sand with a waterhose adding water continually after burial up to the neck height

m.youtube.com/watch?v=cNzu73dM

Self proclaimed Jews promoting segregation from gentiles but complain when gentiles promote segregation

Screenshot from video at link

m.youtube.com/watch?v=_4pOKDkb

m.youtube.com/watch?v=z1gJA67V

Nothing Left

Confessions...

Sargon of Akkad reviews book by ex democrat talking about how racist democrats are against white people from an inside the group perspective

@shortstories @cjd
I understand your point, although I differ a bit with the conclusion.

Low math = algorithms, already defined.
Mid math = new models, checked against reality, experimentation.
High math = new abstract models, not empirical proof.

In high math you can't really prove but you can derive a lot of hypotheses based on the implication of the new model, map consequences according to causality and study how it would interact with reality, logically. It's very abstract but useful.

A steriotype can be usually correct without being always correct

@shortstories
That's what happened to me. I believed the low intelligence opinion instinctively because it's logical and easily provable but, for my dismay, the adults, superiors and most peers where mid intelligence that due to hierarchy and a desire to fit (believing wrongly that they had a reason), I accepted it to fit in.

What I learned after figuring out I was right all along, now in the high intelligence camp, is to never doubt my instinct and logic, plus the masses are retarded.

Casual reminder that the original plan for Ben Shapiro's "Lady Ballers" was for it to be an undercover documentary where dudes sign up to compete in women's sports, only to find out that places that allow trans athletes to compete actually have rules and standards.

RE: https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:sefgphqp2xqwh2hawaixykwz/post/3mrvdyog6gs2t

IMO it doesn't really track IQ, it's more a case of intellectual imposter syndrome (they are actually imposters).

People who want to consider themselves smarter than they really are listen to a lot of big wordy pseudointellectual mumbo-jumbo from other people want to consider themselves smarter than they are, and they don't understand it, but they pretend that if they just nod along, they'll convince people that they're smart.

So they all end up kind of converging on these general consensuses (consensii?) like "trust the science" etc...

@shortstories
It's easy to explain. Low intelligence people must face against reality directly and must learn to deal with it or straight up die.

Middle intelligence people are one or two steps away fron direct reality but can't really process abstractions...they are like automatons who can follow instructions.

High intelligence is where you are able to differentiate reality from abstractions, understand their relationship and create mew things/concepts that are effective irl.

There might be times where I have a low intelligence opinion and I am told a middle intelligence opinion but doubt the official mid intelligence opinion for years only to one day understand the high intelligence opinion which was the same as the low intelligence opinion after years of thought, research or life exoerience

At other times I may have been fooled and sincerely believe the mid intelligence deception fod years only to realize I was wrong later

Show thread

There is a meme claiming

Low & High Intelligent people tend to believe the same things

But Average intelligent people tend to believe something that contradicts them

Sometimes it seems like my first opinion on an issue started at lpw intelligence then changed to a contradicting middle intelligence opinion then after further thought and research becomes that of high intelligence which was my initial belief at my low intelligence stage

Sometimes I go straight from low to high skipping middle

Neutral Good - New Testament
Lawful Neutral - Confucianism
Lawful Evil - Babylonian Talmud and Writings of Maimonides
Chaotic Evil - Kabbalah

Physics IQ 128 to 135

Sociology IQ 104 to 114

Physics 14 to 31 points higher than sociologists on average

myiqscores.com/iq-by-major

@shortstories @SilentSeeker No shit, but no one with an above-average IQ considers Sociology a legitimate academic discipline. It's little different from Gender or African-American Studies.
Show older
Merovingian Club

A club for red-pilled exiles.