Show newer

The US Supreme Court on Friday temporarily blocked the Trump Administration from deporting dangerous Venezuelan gang members under the Alien Enemies Act.

thegatewaypundit.com/2025/05/b

SPEAKING OF!
REMEMBER THE HMONG? REMEMBER WHEN USG GAVE OUT "LIVE IN PROXIMITY TO WHITES" AS A BENNIE, A TREAT FOR BEING LOYAL IN A WAR, TO AN ENTIRE ETHNICITY?

DON'T EVER EQUIVOCATE THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA WITH WHITE PEOPLE OR A NATION OR A COUNTRY OF WHITE PEOPLE.
IT'S LIKE THIS FUCKING CORPORATE OFFICE THAT HAS ACCESS TO WHITE PEOPLE AS A RESOURCE

"GET TO WIN A LIFE NEXT TO WHITE PEOPLE AS A REWARD FOR HELPING USG POLITICAL GOALS" IS A VERY PERSISTENT NOTION
MOST RECENTLY IT WAS APPLIED TO "THE PEOPLE WHO HELPED US IN AFGHANISTAN" BUT IT'S A GENERAL AMBIENT NOTION FLOATING IN THE BACKGROUND OF ALL ETHNIC MIGRANT SCHEMES

There was this villain in this old cartoon that used a sonic device to turn people's hair from non white colors to white and then he said now I control the President

Was this symbolic of using the sound from the mainstream media to persuade large number of elderly people to support the political system in the way the mainstream media intends

@nugger >getting gay married to avoid mantax
Despite how unified the left appears to be, they still have massive cracks that I never see pushed open, and this is one of those. Fags (and esp. troons) are completely at odds with feminism, and you could theoretically undo entire waves of feminism simply through taking their appeals to equality and fairness to it's logical conclusion.
There's literally no downside to changing your driver's license to "F" and using in all legal applications. You can get put into a hiring pool you wouldn't have had access to otherwise. You can fill employer quotas so they never have to hire HR. You suddenly are eligible for thousands of grants and scholarships, too. Bachelor taxes would most likely be exempt, and if women rally together and codify trannies out of legal definitions then congrats, you're letting them clean up our culture for us. Win/Win.

So they used to talk about forcing everybody into tall buildings in compact cities because it would be allegedly better for the environment than having a lot of small population density zones with people spread far apart

And I was thinking if you made everybody of every race and every language live in one really tall building tall enough to fit the entire population of the world that would be like the tower of Babel from Genesis in the Bible

In allignment with the Kike Mystety Babylon

@Waldbrand @DEERBLOOD I had lower back pain from the military for years. Lifting weights helped a lot.

Look into the Charter of the Forest 1217

Imagine if someone simply declared that they owned all the land and all the forests that grow out of that land so you could not chop wood for fuel to keep warm nor build a house out of wood nor garden your own food supply because they own all the land

Then think about property taxes

Some people would rather make a higher percent of people own nothing as long as the richest people are less rich than make a lower percent of people own nothing but make the richest people more rich because economic equality is more important to them than helping the poor become less poor

In civilation one there is a women's suffrage wonder where you can send military units out of the city without making the citizens discontent or as discontent as they otherwise would have been

Basically feminism was a tool to trick civilians into being more OK with men being drafted into war in civilization one

Thoughts

I just learned what a Plutocracy is, it’s how I would describe the way the system between the govern and the government is ran in the United States.

My system of government built on the foundations of freedom would be a Civic Sovereignty system.

A governance model where power is rooted in the autonomy, responsibility, and consent of the people. The government exists to serve, not rule—and operates with transparency, accountability, and clear boundaries.

Civic Sovereignty Implemented under capitalism

• Free markets, but with clear ethical boundaries—no exploitation, no monopolies, no corruption.
• Government transparency is non-negotiable—citizens see where money goes and how decisions are made.
• Local communities control local resources. Small businesses and co-ops are empowered over corporate monopolies.
• Lobbying is limited and public. Corporate power doesn’t outweigh citizen voices.
1/2

Civic Sovereignty Implemented under capitalism cont.

• Citizens have the tools to challenge unfair practices and participate directly in shaping laws.
• Schools teach financial literacy, civic engagement, and accountability—not just obedience.
• Wealth is earned, but freedom is shared. Everyone plays by the same rules.
2/2

Way to think about it.
Local neighborhoods decide how their taxes are spent not distant governments.

Businesses must be honest and fair and people can easily see what they do.

-Schools teach kids how to be responsible citizens not just how to obey.

-Citizens have real power to say no when companies or government act unfairly.

Civic Sovereignty idea

Civic Sovereignty: Core Principles

• Individual Freedom — You govern your own life, as long as you respect the freedom and safety of others.
• Mutual Accountability — No one is above responsibility. Citizens and institutions must answer for their actions.
• Transparent Governance — Government must be open, honest, and visible to the people it serves.
• Consent-Based Authority — Power comes from the people. Laws and policies require civic input.

1/2

Show older
Merovingian Club

A club for red-pilled exiles.