If you are for individualism, you should be for depopulation.
The more abundant a resource is, the less value it holds individually. It's the same with people. We can afford to be weak, because we are so many.
Moreover, there isn't enough land or game to hunt for everyone. We have to mass produce food, vaccinate animals/plants, genetically alter them and force them to grow in unhealthy and unnatural conditions.
Quality, not quantity. We don't need more normies, regardless of their race.
The problem is not the population increasing or decreasing
But the ratios of parasites to non-parasites
The Welfare state increases the parasite population through unethical means such as through supporting a involuntary tax claimed to be used for welfare
While decreasing the population of people who either work alone to produce their own resources by themselves or who engage in voluntary trade
I do not support directly killing the parasites through initiating violence but only using defensive force
I would support that the parasites be put in a situation where they can only support themselves through voluntary trade or physical labor such as farming their own food or voluntary donations and be given a opportunity to not be parasites anymore
Some people currently on welfare are on welfare because their are too many regulations to support themselves legally
@shortstories @Based_Accelerationist I am for solving problem so if they need to die I will support it.
Yea It is like in nature there is always balance with preys to predators. So even preys control the population of predators.
This is one of the problem of capitalism and government.
Where they ruin the balance of preys and predators.
Now mainly companies drain money but we lack the money making companies to produce.
Because every small business is ruined by monopols
