If you are for individualism, you should be for depopulation.
The more abundant a resource is, the less value it holds individually. It's the same with people. We can afford to be weak, because we are so many.
Moreover, there isn't enough land or game to hunt for everyone. We have to mass produce food, vaccinate animals/plants, genetically alter them and force them to grow in unhealthy and unnatural conditions.
Quality, not quantity. We don't need more normies, regardless of their race.
I don't even bother trying to warn family or friends anymore.
@Mommy Most already made their choice on where they stand. Only try to warn the people you will want by your side and who are capable of listening.
There's going to be lots of death and destruction soon so you don't have to actually go out of your way to make it happen. Whether it'd be hyperinflation/dedollarization that leads to the end of the welfare state and the modern healthcare system or the nukes just fly and only small pockets of humanity have to recover from the stone age.
@Mommy Indeed, the era of abundance won't be coming back any time soon, at least in the West.
I hope the collapse is fast and chaotic, not only because apathy is a problem but because I'm worried the powers that be will take over and continue their plans unless they too are taken down a peg.
They might actually allow Trump to be president so that they can fuck the financial system when he's in but I don't think people are going to believe that he is to blame for it. If this is the case then at least Trump is still in power and he's not perfect but I trust him to try and make things better if he can. We'll see. No idea how this'll play out.
@Mommy The financial system will crash sooner or later, it could be right after Trump wins, or after WW3 is officially declared and they shift to a war economy using it as a scapegoat. We'll see.
Either way, Trump is pandering to Israel more than anyone else and given his past, I don't see him not pushing their zionist agenda. Whoever's in charge won't have a choice but to obey, I'm afraid.
@Based_Accelerationist Anyway. I don't think the evil forces are going to maintain control. But I am afraid of what government comes after.
The problem is not the population increasing or decreasing
But the ratios of parasites to non-parasites
The Welfare state increases the parasite population through unethical means such as through supporting a involuntary tax claimed to be used for welfare
While decreasing the population of people who either work alone to produce their own resources by themselves or who engage in voluntary trade
I do not support directly killing the parasites through initiating violence but only using defensive force
I would support that the parasites be put in a situation where they can only support themselves through voluntary trade or physical labor such as farming their own food or voluntary donations and be given a opportunity to not be parasites anymore
Some people currently on welfare are on welfare because their are too many regulations to support themselves legally
@shortstories @Based_Accelerationist I am for solving problem so if they need to die I will support it.
Yea It is like in nature there is always balance with preys to predators. So even preys control the population of predators.
This is one of the problem of capitalism and government.
Where they ruin the balance of preys and predators.
Now mainly companies drain money but we lack the money making companies to produce.
Because every small business is ruined by monopols
@shortstories It's technically true that the ratio is what matters, but in practical terms, the greater the number of plebs, the less likely the parasites will remain a minority. Big numbers are hard to manage, so much so that almost any political system can work when you're working with a small group of people who all have to work to survive. It shouldn't be a population size issue, but it inevitably becomes one. To put it simply, lots of people together can afford to be weak individually.
Infectious diseases for instance, are an individualist's best friend, for nothing else punishes groups and promotes isolation to the same extent. So are government mandated vaccines. Preferable to war, that's for sure.