just fyi:
- bolsheviks = jews
- troskists = jews
- marxists = jews
- social gospel = jews(yep, look into it)
- frankfurt school = jews
- cultural marxism = jews
- banking, education, media, entertainment, porn, government... = jews
How did it take you this long to figure out that it was the jews all along
@37712 @Tfmonkey
1/2
Just a quick perusal in Wikipedia, which I'm happy to accept is wrong if you can show otherwise:
Notable leaders and figures in the Social Gospel movement:
* Richard T. Ely - Episcopalian (Christian)
* Josiah Strong - Protestant clergyman (Christian)
* Washington Gladden - Congregational (Calvinist reformed) pastor (Christian)
* Walter Rauschenbusch - Theologian and Baptist pastor (Christian)
The Social Gospel movement was indeed Christian in origin and it's founder Walter Rauschenbusch formed an alliance with the Fabian Socialists, who were the forerunners of the UK's Labour Party. Unlike straight Marxists, they favored propaganda & infiltration of universities, seminaries and churches.
There were plenty of Jews in all of this. @37712's larger point is that all tributaries end up centralizing to Jewish ethics and organizations.
@UncleIroh @37712 @Tfmonkey Perhaps I was being too literal, but when someone says "social gospel = jews", I expect something obvious like at least ONE of the most prominent figures in the movement being ethnically and religiously jewish.
I'm happy to agree if it can be proven, but no evidence has been presented to demonstrate the point being made.
You've picked the one point on his long list that can be most easily challenged, historically.
I've just given you that they were largely Christian in origin (specifically Protestant, which matters, since Orthodoxy & Catholicism regard Protestantism as heresy all the way back to Luther anyway. Which it is.)
The larger point being made is that a non-US race/religion/country with vast global wealth, power & influence have their hands on all our levers of power.
I did choose the social gospel movement because that is what anyone would do: Someone finds the weakest argument being made and asks for proof or provides counter arguments. Because these are historical claims, they should be easy to demonstrate as being either true or false.
I agree that there are many of these individuals who have control over the levers of power. I'll stop posting on this thread now because it's not helpful.
You're totally right to point out and challenge the single weakness in his argument, it's fair.
And relevant, since the weaknesses in Protestantism that gave us Social Gospelism and Fabian Socialism still exist. They have their part to play in the horrors of Feminism and GloboHomo.
The Christian Right has a lot to answer for, and just like TWRA is a solution, so is TJewRA,and TChristianZioRA. Women and Christian Zios will always be a vector of attack.
