How sad it is that a basic concept like evolution is still so heatedly debated in current year, when people in Ancient Greece already grasped it?
Abrahamic religions really are the worst thing that ever happened to mankind.
What you have just demonstrated is an entirely faith-based assertion of your certainty that Darwin's evolutionary theory is true. By which you most likely mean natural selection.
You sound like a religious Darwinist. In case you didn't know, there is a growing dissatisfaction with the scientific orthodoxy, & Darwin is under serious challenge by scientists from different disciplines.
Here are 2 accessible examples:
Btw, we can and do observe Darwins evolutionary principles in microbiological life due to it's short life cycle and quickly processing generations.
@white_male @Based_Accelerationist
I don't care if 2 out of the 5 are kikes, it's the views being explored I care about here since they are representative of many thousands of scientists who are pulling on the same threads.
@white_male @Based_Accelerationist
I could give less of a shit about the noise around that subject and the "solutions" they come up with that just so happen to be communism, every time.
Now go and fuck yourself. Purity tests are for weak assholes.
Are you a fucking fedora tipper? You just care about your pet subject? Have you listened to enough debate bros in your life already? ;D
@white_male @Based_Accelerationist
Just remember, you can always edgelord harder. You got this!
Or is it just shitting on Darwinism for whatever reason?
@white_male @Based_Accelerationist
How about you start off with the disciplines discussed/represented in those videos? Molecular biology, computational biology, mathematics and geology.
As for philosophy, there have already been considerable philosophical and political downstream effects from Darwinism, mostly via eugenics, which our elites are speedrunning with reckless abandon.
@white_male @Based_Accelerationist
> WTF are political downstream effects from Darwinism?
Really?
Darwinism greatly influenced philosophers, particularly around epistemology and ethics. Nietzsche, William James, Herbert Spencer & Huxley are examples.
Those in turn influence political theory - pragmatism, eugenics, secularism (church vs state).
This is not difficult, and pretending with the whole "WTF?!" is dumb and annoying.
Eugenics, as tragic as it was, saved Sweden for example from genetic collapse due to massive inbreeding.
There's good and bad, as per usual.
Would you claim race realism was inspired by Darwinism too?
@white_male @Based_Accelerationist
We have an elite political class and billionaire donor class that are fully bought into Malthusian eugenics and depopulation agendas. Climate change is but one head of that hydra.
Want to know what they want politically and which thinkers they respect? Read their fucking books, they tell you directly.
The line connecting WHO policies to political theories that in turn ultimately inherit from the philosophical implications of Darwinism couldn't be clearer.
@white_male @Based_Accelerationist
It's genuinely depressing that this is how you think proof works. It's not.
Elites having a zealot like faith in the theory behind Darwinism and then commandeering the process on the assumption that it's (a) true and (b) they can do it better is proof of nothing. Not inductive or deductive.
It just proves that they're insane psychopathic zealots.
So, are you white?
@white_male @Based_Accelerationist
"It works" is an assertion, a declaration of faith. Not a proof.
Yes. Now go fuck yourself. I'm done with your purity testing bullshit. The minute you start asking if I'm a Jew or a nigger is the moment I block you.
So in the sense, politicians/overlords/whatever use and abuse parts or all of Darwinism and other mechanism derived/inspired by it. Isn't this a proof that this works and some mathematical disagreement is inconsequential?