What you have just demonstrated is an entirely faith-based assertion of your certainty that Darwin's evolutionary theory is true. By which you most likely mean natural selection.
You sound like a religious Darwinist. In case you didn't know, there is a growing dissatisfaction with the scientific orthodoxy, & Darwin is under serious challenge by scientists from different disciplines.
Here are 2 accessible examples:
@white_male @Based_Accelerationist
I don't care if 2 out of the 5 are kikes, it's the views being explored I care about here since they are representative of many thousands of scientists who are pulling on the same threads.
@white_male @Based_Accelerationist
I could give less of a shit about the noise around that subject and the "solutions" they come up with that just so happen to be communism, every time.
Now go and fuck yourself. Purity tests are for weak assholes.
@white_male @Based_Accelerationist
Just remember, you can always edgelord harder. You got this!
@white_male @Based_Accelerationist
How about you start off with the disciplines discussed/represented in those videos? Molecular biology, computational biology, mathematics and geology.
As for philosophy, there have already been considerable philosophical and political downstream effects from Darwinism, mostly via eugenics, which our elites are speedrunning with reckless abandon.
@white_male @Based_Accelerationist
> WTF are political downstream effects from Darwinism?
Really?
Darwinism greatly influenced philosophers, particularly around epistemology and ethics. Nietzsche, William James, Herbert Spencer & Huxley are examples.
Those in turn influence political theory - pragmatism, eugenics, secularism (church vs state).
This is not difficult, and pretending with the whole "WTF?!" is dumb and annoying.
@white_male @Based_Accelerationist
We have an elite political class and billionaire donor class that are fully bought into Malthusian eugenics and depopulation agendas. Climate change is but one head of that hydra.
Want to know what they want politically and which thinkers they respect? Read their fucking books, they tell you directly.
The line connecting WHO policies to political theories that in turn ultimately inherit from the philosophical implications of Darwinism couldn't be clearer.
@white_male @Based_Accelerationist
It's genuinely depressing that this is how you think proof works. It's not.
Elites having a zealot like faith in the theory behind Darwinism and then commandeering the process on the assumption that it's (a) true and (b) they can do it better is proof of nothing. Not inductive or deductive.
It just proves that they're insane psychopathic zealots.
@white_male @Based_Accelerationist
"It works" is an assertion, a declaration of faith. Not a proof.
Yes. Now go fuck yourself. I'm done with your purity testing bullshit. The minute you start asking if I'm a Jew or a nigger is the moment I block you.
@UncleIroh @Based_Accelerationist
Pretty much. There is never a point where scientists stop debating science.
When it's considered "established" by the government, it literally give us gems like the fauci ouchi and gender theory.
@UncleIroh What does any of this have to do with Darwin? I said evolution, like gravity, is undeniable. I didn't say I specifically agree with Darwin's theory (which isn't even the currently accepted version in many regards). I do agree that death is a necessary component of evolution (natural selection), but that's about it.
@Based_Accelerationist Bro don’t bother. @UncleIroh is just another religitard.
He and I had a spat where I asked him to prove his god (Christian) is real and he said “I don’t have to prove anything to you, I know God is real.”
Just don’t bother.
@Mr_Mister @Based_Accelerationist
If I recall, I had to treat you like a kid who wouldn't shut up that his daddy couldn't make his fish talk like Nemo.
You demonstrated zero skill for stringing 2 thoughts together. It was pathetic.
Well now you're just speaking out of the side of your mouth like a sneaky Jew.
> How sad it is that a basic concept like evolution is still so heatedly debated
Darwinism is by far the most common framework that people use when talking about "evolution being debated". Especially without any other qualifiers. That assumption would be like 99.99% of people.
So now you can go fuck yourself with a cactus.
@UncleIroh What... My Judeo Christian guy, first you accuse me of blindly believing a person. I explain to you that evolution, like gravity, is a phenomenon, which is provable and undeniable AND the theories of evolution are a separate thing (including Darwin's) which should be questioned, tested and debated.
And now you call me a Jew for correcting you.
Do better, seriously.
You: > How sad it is that a basic concept like evolution is still so heatedly debated
Also you: > theories of evolution.[..] should be questioned, tested and debated.
You are a whole retard.
> I explain to you that evolution, like gravity, is a phenomenon, which is provable and undeniable
Which part of evolution is provable and undeniable? Natural selection?, Sexual selection? Micro-evolution (in-species change)? Macro evolution (branch changes, new species)?
One of those can be proved. You are a retard.
@UncleIroh Next sunday, instead of going to Church, try putting on a lab coat and observe how bacteria replicates. Or read any book on the subject, it's possible to see the process of evolution in real time.
Natural selection is observable/provable as well. I don't think you understand the concept. It merely states that death (brought by environmental stimuli) determines which traits are passed on. If you breed animals, or study how dog breeds are made, you will see that process in action.
@UncleIroh It's not my fault if you misinterpreted my words.
The concept of evolution itself is undeniable and it's appalling that people debate whether it's real or not. The scientific theories (which explain how the process works) are another thing entirely.
What's retarded is that, despite the fact I've answered you more than once to clear up the difference, you're still acting outraged over it.
> It's not my fault ..
And that just about sums up your character.
You didn't have to add dishonesty, a lack of good faith and a dash of low IQ, but it is what it is.
Lesson learned. I will not engage again.
@UncleIroh You sure are trying hard to act as if I wronged you somehow. Oh HOW could I "mislead" you into thinking I was talking about the theories of evolution and not evolution itself! The humanity!
Meanwhile, I've cleared it up so there's no further confusion and you keep calling people retards and throwing around ridiculous insults.
But sure, I'm the one here in bad faith and with low IQ.
It seems churches sure could use more mirrors.
@UncleIroh @Based_Accelerationist Poor little thing thinking that some delusional person can disprove The Theory of Evolution
@VeganMGTOW @Based_Accelerationist
Dude, as a vegan you're just about qualified to sit in the corner and play with your own feces.
However, I'll give you a chance to redeem yourself: try to complete this jigsaw puzzle without dribbling over yourself.
@UncleIroh @Based_Accelerationist Yeah enjoy your tasty tumors.
Btw, we can and do observe Darwins evolutionary principles in microbiological life due to it's short life cycle and quickly processing generations.