His Manifesto, as well as his other books, are worthy of examination.
Also, His brother is one of the worst traitors and should know no love from anyone who ever encounters him.
The man sold out his own brother for thirty pieces of silver in the form of a million dollar reward, at the urging of his snake of a wife. Few people deserve hatred as much as someone who would betray their kin like that.
If you're talking about the Unabomber idk man...
Dude had a great philosophy but killing random people is not cool.
The brother probably saved the lives of dozens of people so it's not really a betrayal.
If my brother was going around killing randos I'd tell the police too.
@basedbagel @sardonicsmile his targets were specific I think
Maybe so but you can't just murder people because you don't agree with their philosophy and expect everyone to be okay with that.
All that bullshit he did and what changed?
Not a damn thing except he's in a cage forever and he embarrassed his family.
As smart as he was he could have just saved some shekels and left the US.
@basedbagel @Scubbie @sardonicsmile - "...you can't just murder people because you don't agree with their philosophy..."
I guess I gotta be that guy. 😅
I believe that you have just described war, sir. Uncle Ted's greatest sin, is that he lost his war.
I used to wonder what made war different from murder. 🤔 I'm not alone in deciding that ultimately, there is no difference.
Most see it as delegitimizing war. I see it as legitimizing murder. 💁🏻♂️🍻
@Scubbie @sardonicsmile
War /= random murder.
War is when 1 state of train soldiers fight another state of trained soldiers for resources.
Not when a nutcase murders unarmed civilians that he doesn't even know.
I know you like the guys philosophy but the problem isn't that he lost the "war". The problem is that he's a nutcase!
There was no endgame his murder spree so he couldn't be reasoned with.
At least when states to to war you can negotiate. You can't negotiate with crazies.
@basedbagel @Scubbie @sardonicsmile - "War ≠ random murder"
Eh, agree to disagree.
Why do people murder each other (random or not), and why do states go to war (and have throughout history & prehistory)? The reasons are the same: Resources, mating, vengeance, ideological differences, self-defense (real or perceived), etc.
A murder is easier to assign guilt for, because it's a single guilty party. But there's just as much guilt to be assigned for a war death. Every American bears ➡️
@YoMomz @Scubbie @sardonicsmile
Here's where I hard disagree.
Every American is NOT guilty for death in the middle east.
1. The money to fund the war was taken from us at gunpoint, we didn't donate it to them
2. Most Americans don't have the power or say so to start or stop any conflict.
We're just cogs in the machine.
If I stopped paying my taxes in protest of wars, I'd just get arrested and the wars would continue anyway.
The situation sucks but its not on the everyday american
@basedbagel @Scubbie @sardonicsmile - Opinions on the justness of American war in the middle east, vary.
But if a bystander has any moral or ethical duty to stop a murder in progress, then a nation's populace has a duty to rise up and slay their leaders (if need be), in order to stop an unjust foreign war.
The American populace did not do that. So, they all share in the guilt of those wars - me, you, and every other American (assuming you're American here - forgive me if not). ➡️
@YoMomz @Scubbie @sardonicsmile
A bystander doesn't have an ethical duty to stop a murder, they should just call the police.
We don't run our society of vigilante justice.. yet.
Americans are NOT guilty because in case you haven't noticed the people pulling the strings are not accountable to the people.
Ex. FBI, NSA, CIA, WEF, WHO
