houseoftolstoy @[email protected]

@WashedOutGundamPilot Sex is somehow only able to be practiced with a whole lot of other people rather than exclusively experienced with one person ever. The delusion of some people that sex cannot be improved with one person over time is asinine. Sex is far less complicated than they make it out to be.

Besides, you are far more likely to get a jaded woman who rejects trying anything out because she's "already done that."

@furgar Yeah, Reddit sucks, especially all the generically named subs. As I recall, that subreddit has an atheist mod, so that tells you everything you need to know. I don't ever go to that sub, but I am sure they would contradict what it says in Romans 12 about not conforming to the world. Because they conform in every way they can that contradicts the Bible in favor of globohomo.

@Humpleupagus She thinks she has anything to share about making a difference with climate change? Please. The moment any measures to supposedly deal with climate change are enacted she will be crying about how much worse her life is when she cannot fulfill her materialistic desires as regularly.

The pampered western woman only knows virtue signaling when it comes to "muh climate change."

@CoolHandJames She thinks she has anything to share about making a difference with climate change? Please. The moment any measures to supposedly deal with climate change are enacted she will be crying about how much worse her life is when she cannot fulfill her materialistic desires as regularly.

The pampered western woman only knows virtue signaling when it comes to "muh climate change."

@Shlomo "Why are you not going into a ton of debt for a car you do not need? I can't live my own life without putting up appearances, so that must be the case with you, since everyone is exactly like that! So you must be poor!"

I despise these kinds of morons and midwits. All about appearances, nothing of real substance.

@amr @37712 My guess would be yes, as I was not able to see images from other instances for the same period of time.

@Tfmonkey 4/ Also, it makes no fucking sense that the communists would be fighting harder than the nationalists in China, because the communists could just sit and wait for the National forces to fall while they take over. Which is exactly what HD said happened. Makes a lot more sense than the communists actually fighting themselves and winning over the people as a result.

@Tfmonkey 3/ We simply cannot take what we think we know to be true at face value. We need to be ready to receive new information. No surprise, the book I am reading is talking about Joseph McCarthy himself, who is maligned by our own leftists who teach history.

That is why when HD said what he said was quite revealing. History is often slanted heavily by those who have an agenda.

@Tfmonkey 2/ Yes, I am aware that what the history book said sounds like bullshit. It sure was. The eye opening part was how those who win often write history. I don't think there was a communist conspiracy on the part of the textbook writers (even if they are leftists), but rather that they simply took the word of someone else saying it. Not the Chinese, but communist sympathizers in our own government. I have been reading Blacklisted by History, which talks about the communist lies.

@Tfmonkey 1/ Something HD on your stream said was quite eye opening. It was what he was saying about how the National government of China was taking far more heavy losses against the Japanese than the Communist forces. It was not his statement that was surprising in itself, but rather that I recall my own school history books saying the exact opposite, that the Communists themselves were the ones who were doing the hardest fighting but won the people over with their sacrifice.

What can we learn from Florida's governor race? We found out that all that faggot leftists on Twitter and Reddit are out of touch with what the people of Florida actually want. It turns out that no matter how much idiots not living in the state use the buzzword "DeathSantis," reality showed that they were thriving with the state's lack of restrictions and if anything, showed that they approved of his decisions.

Moral of the story: online retards are not a reliable source of information.

@CoolHandJames Damn it, we don't need a combination of Slingblade and Lurch in the Senate, but it looks like we are going to get that. This must be your fault, somehow.

Yes, I know the cat was out of the bag in 2020, and that we cannot trust the election results in many cases. But this will show if there is a genuine start of a trend or if 2020 was just big enough of a deal for them to be so overt on stealing.

And it will show if anyone is going to be foolish enough to put money on the table for a candidate that does not have the Cathedral's approval in a swing state.

Screenshot of electionbettingodds.com as of now. What is important is not what the numbers exactly are for swing states, but rather what happens when people realize what is happening with any "mail in votes" or any other shenanigans. Bets will swing if they know something is in the works.

If there is any riggery, I have to wonder if anyone is going to want to place a bet, since the outcome can always be "fortified."

I just thought of a great way to cut down and the amount of time and effort it takes for journalists to do their work: all they have to do is stop lying!

Just think of how much time it takes to dance around the topics or create a narrative to get people to think a certain way. You could be far more efficient by just cutting out the bullshit and just having the truth to begin with. All that crafting of half-truths and spinning takes much more work that being straightforward.

@Moon Yes, journalism is a hard profession. You have to spend a lot of time doing research and double checking your sources before you write one word of an article. That way when you are crafting the lies that make up the "news," you can make sure that it is convincing long enough for the idiotic masses not to notice how full of shit you are.