houseoftolstoy @[email protected]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bI_0OySV170

How shocking! JustPearlyThings is full of shit and does not practice what she preaches. And it should not be shocking that she is only in it for the money, given that she is just repackaging talking points that other men in the Manosphere already have said.

Also, we should call her JustParrotingThings.

@Scubbie let me guess, the melody starts with the notes: F E D

@nugger That is not something that I thought about, but that is something I cannot rule out. Though with the trajectory of how our military is operating, throwing more money at the problem is going to be as effective as it is at solving poverty and bad education outcomes. Which means that our military will still perform poorly.

But let's consider the plight of our defense contractors. Without more wars, how will all the higher ups be able to afford their backyard pools?

I would prefer we not go to war with China. I am not feeling all that much patriotic fervor when our government hates me for being a straight white male. Along with all the other gay and retarded policies that our government currently forces upon us.

"Likewise, for every consequence the United States was willing to impose on China in the game, the CCP regime had its own response prepared.

In response to being booted from the SWIFT international banking system, for example, the Chinese side cut the United States off from all Chinese battery technology, used in everything from iPhones to electric vehicles."

So war with China would necessarily mean that the environmentalist retards would be told to shut up so we can mine. If we have any sense

"The game was ultimately cut short because of time constraints, but its conclusions nevertheless presented the Select Committee with a sobering reality: Resupplying Taiwan with arms and other critical supplies after a CCP blockade had been imposed was not possible.

Likewise, without additional basing options with regional allies, the U.S. side risked immense casualties and its stockpiles of long-range missiles being depleted in short order."

Yep, we would not be not fighting goat herders here.

Not exactly sure how accurate and realistic these war game exercises are, but perhaps they might serve a purpose when they tell us the US will not just outright win. That is, assuming our politicians are not retarded enough to go through a full scale war with China.

@deprecated_ii It isn't always acting. People are often really are as stupid as the present themselves to be.

@rlier23 Most Americans are not ready to have a full on revolution. That is indeed how far things would have to go to stop this, because the highest levels of government are backing the gay agenda. Granted, that is not the only issue that our government is responsible for, but it sure as hell is one of the most visible ones.

@DW2 New meta just dropped. Instead of getting a credit card and paying off your bill each month regularly, just pay the bare minimum until your credit score tanks. Then apply for a mortgage loan.

Yeah, I can't see how this could possibly go wrong.

Side note: a lot of mortgage companies/banks show how lazy they are when they only look at credit scores instead of having an underwriting process.

MAGIC NUMBER UP! THAT GOOD! MAGIC NUMBER DOWN! THAT BAD! (well maybe not anymore).

https://voxday.net/2023/04/18/silicon-valley-is-fake-and-gay/

I have often wondered how a lot of various tech startups are able to make money. Often, it turns out that they don't.

@Aether m =2, n = 4

@DW2 Women might not like being "objectified" like this, but that is because they have a far easier time getting attention and desire from the opposite sex. But doing the same to men does not objectify him.

What does objectify a man is to use him for his money. Oh wait, we already have that happening with women who use false pretenses to get free meals, when women divorce men to get alimony, and by our own government taking taxes from (mostly) men and subsidizing mainly women.

@DW2 "Oh no, these men are being used and objectified!"

A classic case of projection along with a lack of understanding the male experience. Most men are fine being "used" and "objectified" sexually, because they get exactly what they want out of the arrangement. Many men get ignored, overlooked, or scorned on a regular basis that getting this sort of attention is a breath of fresh air.

@WashedOutGundamPilot Speaking more on sex and marriage, marriage is supposed to signify commitment to the greatest extent, which necessarily includes sex with that commitment. Why would I buy the milk when someone else gets to take a drink for free?

Not keeping sex within the marriage means the marriage has no point. Which is why infidelity has been valid grounds for divorce (even in the Bible and even said so by Jesus himself).

@WashedOutGundamPilot >It's not about sex

Funny she mentions that, as sex is the most exclusive part of any romantic relationship, the act that is the most gatekept. That is why sleeping with someone else is considered such a great betrayal of a relationship (especially with marriage).

If she was not going to be screwing other guys, then what is she going to be doing that she feels the need to say that she wants the relationship opened? She is just full of shit.

Sometimes I have to remember that much of the world is built with normies in mind, not for those on the autism spectrum (like me).

For example, many businesses will use pricing formats such as $29.99. The normie thinks 29 dollars, and subconsciously focuses on the 20 part of the cost. I, on the other hand, will see this as 30 dollars.

Maybe not quite an autism thing, but perhaps I can list other examples.