Show newer

@Zeb @Stahesh Yes, there will always be parrots saying what others have said. Though I will give credit if those repeating what others already said recognized the wisdom from someone else and found it worth stealing. Not everyone steals good ideas. Some people steal terrible ones.

And unfortunately many ears will be more interested just because a woman said it. Such is life.

@GoodBoyUV @WashedOutGundamPilot It is easy to "go to the gym every day" if all you are doing is the elliptical machines. The perfect "exercise" that feels effortless because it literally is.

And of course nobody cares about how often you claim to do something. It is the results that matter. Same with the "I eat so healthy" people who claim being fat is just genetics. Clearly, the words do not match the results.

@WashedOutGundamPilot @GoodBoyUV I am sorry you subscribed to something as piss poor of an excuse for a gym as Planet Fitness. I find that Anytime Fitness is a far better gym to have a membership for if you are frequent traveler. I have always been able to find squat racks/power cages at every location I have been to for them. I see that as essential as you can do most real exercises with at least that.

And no Planet Fitness, a Smith machine is not a squat rack.

Looks like the results are concluded. With the sample size that is totally scientific, it seems most men would be fine with such an arrangement. But I am willing to bet that most women would not be fine with this, even if they virtue signal that they would be.

But in the end, the faggots arguing that "men should embrace other roles" fail to understand that men would be fine accepting roles such as stay-at-home husband. It is the women who do not want this. So maybe lay off the men for once?

Show thread

Looks like the results are concluded. With the sample size that is totally scientific, it seems most men would be fine with such an arrangement. But I am willing to bet that most women would not be fine with this, even if they virtue signal that they would be.

But in the end, the faggots arguing that "men should embrace other roles" fail to understand that men would be fine accepting roles such as stay-at-home husband. It is the women who do not want this. So maybe lay off the men for once?

Show thread

Just saw a billboard ad from Planned Parenthood that said "LGBTQ children deserve proper sex educuation." I am not even sure what that is supposed to mean, but I have my guesses. And my guesses are that that graph on "what will happen if gay marriage is passed" pie graph is wrong and any lefty faggots that claim "the slippery slope is a FALLACY" are either stupid or liars.

Because if they are not teaching gay sex in schools, then why would it make a difference how it is taught?

@caekislove it is already a hard sell for many men to consider dating a single mom. No men prefer that, but some accept it if they have no better options. But her having a mixed race child makes it a far harder sell, as everyone in the world will know that the man is not the father of the child. No man wants to broadcast to the world that he is a cuck, so it is no shock that this becomes a deal breaker.

Though frankly, her being a single mom in general should be the dealbreaker.

Overt actions would be the government stepping in directly. But covertly, we see many frivolous lawsuits to go through the courts while the government either sits by or is actively encouraging the people initiating the lawsuits to force companies to waste money on lawyers for cases that never should have gone to court.

My guess is salaries for do-nothing positions are cheaper than lawyers for many employers.

Show thread

Just think about how much more productive and efficient our economy would be if companies did not have to hire so many dead weight employees that are only there to avoid a lawsuit. A lot of money is wasted because our government will overtly or covertly make life a living hell for companies who do not bend the knee to DIE policies.

I really doubt employers want to throw money down the drain for positions that lead to not only no additional productivity, but often less productivity.

Hell, let's make a poll. Men, if you had a woman who earned enough to provide for a family with her work, would you be willing to be a "house husband?"

Added conditions, she will never cheat, divorce you, love you, and still see you as a proper man (fantasy land, I know, but this is all hypothetical).

Show thread
@houseoftolstoy I know that people stay anonymous for different reasons. I appreciate when someone tries to remain anonymous when they are publishing or creating something for public consumption. I like the idea that someone wants to be judged on the merits of what they've created and not what people will think and judge them by, because of their appearance, gender etc. It is a type of equality that I wish people valued more highly.

One addendum to make, the "love you" part is not a "will never." She will love you and see you as a proper man. I need to work on my wording sometimes.

Show thread

@Indignation @shortstories I am pretty sure I have seen it, but I can watch it again. I am well aware of this fact. That is a major reason why women in general dislike math and science.

@shortstories That could be part of it. I do theorize that many women are operating as they are due to society coddling them, and that they would change their behavior with proper consequences.

Though as for math, many women often just hate it. Think how often you have heard "I hate math." Is it usually a man, or a woman saying this?

Hell, let's make a poll. Men, if you had a woman who earned enough to provide for a family with her work, would you be willing to be a "house husband?"

Added conditions, she will never cheat, divorce you, love you, and still see you as a proper man (fantasy land, I know, but this is all hypothetical).

Show thread

Another side topic, the amazing cope of "men can just adjust to not being the primary breadwinners by finding other roles such as working part time or being the husband that stays at home."

Great! Let's see how well that works when we try to sell that to women, who still want men to fulfill that provider role/earning more. It is like retards pushing these ideas never see what the landscape looks like. It turns out, the natural order of men earning more is preferred by both men and women.

Show thread

This thought came to mind when I was watching this video which has quite the bluepilled take about men becoming more right wing. Here, we can see the full display of the pro equality mindset that feminism is good and that those who oppose feminism only do so because they were "unfairly ahead."

What if men are just better at certain things than women? Such as math, science, athletics, and a variety of other things?

youtube.com/watch?v=54H8ppxnp8

Show thread

There is a fundamental issue with the quote "Equality always feels like a loss to people who are previously unfairly ahead" when you assume that those who are opposed to "equality" are doing so because they fit this category.

Sometimes, they are upset because they are being forcefully dragged back when they were getting ahead by their own merits. Many pro-equality/equity people operate under the assumption that inequality is the result of someone rigging things. Some people are just inferior.

@Indignation Quick question I would have for her, what field of study are these degrees in? Most likely, it is some bullshit like "Communications." She is hardly "overqualified" for the job offer she got, she is merely overeducated. Though "education" these days just means going through a degree mill rather than actually learning something.

Her parents failed her in telling her "any degree is a good degree," as well as her desire for "the college experience."

Show older
Merovingian Club

A club for red-pilled exiles.