houseoftolstoy @[email protected]

@WashedOutGundamPilot It was easy for criticism by those who said, "See, they did not lose money now!" when many people jumped the gun. But we shall see reality assert itself over time if there was any money lost. Then you can throw it in the face of the leftists when you have numbers on your side (and that is an if, given that Bud Light is not the only Budweiser product).

In short, these things take time to see the end results.

@WashedOutGundamPilot I think there was too much jumping the gun with "Budweiser is losing so much money due to the tranny!" Yes, they probably will lose money, but not right away. We need to wait until the supply chain gets to the point in the cycle where the bars/off-sale businesses/concessions do not reorder the beer due to lack of interest.

Then, we will see if they are losing money.

@mutageno I am willing to bet that in some way those environmentalist depend or make use of the products of those corporations. It does not have to be direct for it to be the case. In some way, they would find that something they see as a given is no longer available if those corporations were gone.

Not saying "corporations did nothing wrong," but you have to consider why those corporations are there and why they are polluting. It is not because they are Captain Planet villains.

@DW2 Sachs Goldman? Now they are just screwing with us.

"Let's give him the middle name Sachs, so that it will be like Goldman Sachs but in reverse!"

@RadixVerum @eris My observation is that it is usually low quality women who use the term "pickme," because they find it abhorrent that other women would dare to make themselves appealing to men by offereing something they want instead of being unpleasant and demanding men commit their financial resources for nothing in return.

Not so coincidentally, these are leftist women, so you got that part correct.

@Pain66 >I predict a baby boom in Utah in a few months

This is making a whole lot of wrong assumptions if this guy is serious. First, that men are foregoing sex with women in favor of porn. Porn is most often a substitute when sex is not possible to get, not the first option. Second, that when men lack porn they will be able to have success in sex/dating. Third, that porn is somehow otherwise blocking procreation from happening (you name whatever excuse you want).

Perhaps I shouldn't, but I get tempted to watch the whatever podcast/clips. My morbid curiosity got the better of me when I saw this.

Sure, I am not the first to share this image. But there is something I found out listening to the episode. The one known as "al.weeezy" is troon. But everyone was saying "wow I did not see that, you totally pass!"

Well, when you have so many layers of fat that you no longer look human, does it really matter if you "pass?"

@[email protected] We can even go the route of banning knives or any other items that can be used as weapons. And still, we will have to worry about violence and death, because you are never going to have muscle or size control.

@deprecated_ii So your theory is a case of those women having misunderstanding the cause-and-effect chain? You may be on to something, as we see that with all the "body positivity" and "big is beautiful" propaganda by fat women.

It makes sense that women would come to this conclusion, because this is how they think. They are far more likely to go along with social pressures, thus they think men will if they attempt the same thing on them.

I forgot to mention crime, which no shock, these people also want to be soft on crime. No, your city planning policies will not fix crime (despite their claims) if you are not going to make sure to harshly punish these crimes.

Hey, maybe people do not want to worry that they are going to be beaten and/or mugged on public transit, so they would prefer to be safe in their own cars instead. Is that possible? Oh, you want to blame the symptoms for the problem rather than being soft on crime policy.

Not just idealism at work, but also the additional laws and policies they advocate and vote for.

High taxes? Check.
Expansive welfare state? Check.
Gun control? Check.
LGBTABCDEFG crap? Check.
Other nanny state policies? Check.

Oh look, all shit I hate that you also want to have implemented. So when you make me choose between car dependent cities and walkable cities with a whole lot of other policies I hate, I will go with the former.

I do not want to be against having less car dependency and more walkable cities. The problem is that most of the advocates for these policies have a package deal of other politics that are naive leftist crap.

"[Mostly homogenous and high country] has better city design than in the US! We should be more like them." Which ignores that we have a diverse (and therefore low trust) society in the US. We cannot pretend that city planning will solve problems that come with diversity.

@zebuceta Those women in Hong Kong probably do a lot of walking and NOT stuff their face with food at every moment, which of course is going to be healthier and help them be thinner. Also, this leads to my theory that excess makeup use over time causes a vicious cycle of damaging a woman's face which the response is to use even more makeup.

What if women just held off on using makeup for a while? Maybe see if that helps with their "bad skin" problems.

@WashedOutGundamPilot And I can speak from experience myself that the references I know with anime and video games are not how I would connect with my wife, because she does not have interest in those things. Big deal. We can talk about other things.

@WashedOutGundamPilot First, the idea that a man "needs help" for wanting a woman in her prime is insane as it is an attempt to subvert nature itself (never a smart idea, as instincts are there for a reason).

Second, being able to "banter" or just spout familiar references are so unimportant to a relationship that it is ridiculous to even elevate it's importance. It is more of a red herring than anything.

@professionalbigot69 >zero quality of life

Tell you what, I will take my "zero quality of life" for much cheaper while this faggot pays out the ass for whatever stupid or vapid bullshit he thinks makes his quality of life great.

This is the male equivalent of the iPhone women who think that having green bubbles on her phone is a turn-off. Enjoy the lack of testosterone in your dating pool, iPhone idiots.

@deprecated_ii >to simulate a real world scenario

Yes, the enemy is going to be exactly where you want them to be so that they can just be killed by you.

I would rather not have WWIII, but it might be darkly amusing to see everyone who thinks we can take China in a fight see just how poorly things would go. And even then they just believe we are winning because the media says so. Because we are seeing that already with Ukraine.

@kaiservenom The phrase is false in the sense that it is meant to imply that the man is only able to be successful due to the woman being there, as if he owes his success to her somehow supporting him or whatever. But it is true that there are women behind successful men because women wait at the finish line and only stick around with successful men.