houseoftolstoy @[email protected]

@sj_zero Also, some theories get the well poisoned with additional nonsensical parts so that way it can be "debunked" by the establishment media. They only "debunk" the added crazy parts while not addressing any reasonable parts. That way when someone searches for a conspiracy theory, it leads to "it was debunked" links. The news later loosely references these "debunkings" loosely, hoping you do not look any deeper than their own sources.

@iboughtcryptowhoops This is one example where appearances can be deceiving. What I mean is this couple in the video, not the subject of the video.

When I first saw these two, my assumption was that the man would have the most soyed out politics imaginable. But I was quite wrong. And I am glad to be wrong in cases like these.

@dave They have a season 2? I was not aware that they had a real audience for that dumpster fire of a show.

@basedbagel @theFlow Another moral: anyone who cares about the well-being of a fictional character over that of a real person should not be taken seriously (assuming the real life person is not a horrible person).

@dickflatteningenthusiast I have a theory that it is being pushed with the powers that be knowing it does not and will not work long term, seeing it as an opportunity to force everyone into "smart cities" and defacto ending car ownership without outright banning it.

That way they can say "we did not force you to get rid if your car" while they pushed for the outcome of car removal.

@theFlow If I was in that position, I would most likely just find another source of income. It is too big of a risk to dox yourself, since most likely you have been anonymous for a reason.

@Wolffkran This "joke" does not work as a joke when it is just women hating on men without having any hint of irony. Humor should have an element of truth, but there needs to be a distinction between the "humor" and the unironic thoughts that man-hating women like this have.

@PNS >just because someone is sitting at their desk for 12 hours does not mean you are getting 12 hours of productivity

I am also willing to bet she would not want to collect the productivity data for men and women either. That would not help her case either.

So where is this socialization gap? It does not really exist. Rather, it is just a retarded rationalization by feminists stupid enough to think that strength differences are a result of socialization.

But if you only ever went through life where you can be placed in positions you never should have been in due to state backed gender quotas, it is that surprising that they would think this would apply to biological differences?

Anyone who knows anyone with daughters knows that girls have roughly the same amount of opportunities to participate in sports. Sure, not all the same sports, but girls are provided with the same opportunities to engage in physical activities as boys.

And it is not as if most parents care that much if their children are the best athletes ever. Rather, they just want to give them opportunities to exercise, compete and have fun.

So sure, the woman with a job title can be referred to as such. But if she cannot do the job, then is she really an engineer? Obviously not.

So when we apply this same mindset to other areas, many women will think that they can socially assert other things to become reality.

But if you do not realize that social assertions can only create illusions, you can believe idiotic things like women being just as strong as men, but men are socially conditioned to do sports more than women.

I theorize that women believe that the power of social conditioning can alter reality is due to the fact that for them, it is mostly true.

"Women need to be made engineers so that young girls will be inspired to become engineers!"

You may get a few more women "engineers" with social conditioning and government quotas, but that is only an illusion if women are not fit to be engineers. But for the feminist advocates, the title itself means that the woman is an engineer by title alone.

@Humpleupagus @PapaPole Being able to work for yourself is nice, though it of course comes with the burden all falling on you if you succeed or fail.

Another thing I would mention about the people complaining about modern work is that they want to do something that might technically be labor, but not something in that much demand (many "artists" for example).

Reality and market forces are not valid reasons for complaints.

@PapaPole @Humpleupagus The first question I would ask someone like this is what kind of life does he want to live. The second question would be what is preventing him from living that kind of life?

If the answer to the second question is government or others that would forcefully impede him (assuming he is keeping to himself), then I have sympathy. If it is reality because he just wants to be paid to do jack shit, then he is just a lazy faggot.