Show newer
@Humpleupagus @shortstories I do not know the background or OP's point. But the problem is, anyone that believes seeking truth matters, is discouraged and trampled on publicly. Science is science, what you are describing is corruption of PUBLISHED science (agree, it's fucked, totally, not true often). But fuck if I'm going to say "I don't trust science." I do, which is why anyone that says "trust the science" is INSANE. Science is to ADMIT you don't know what you think you already proved, because you could be wrong. "Authority" position, is not science. "Peer review" is corrupt as fuck (more each year) becoming acceptance and politically approval seeking for funding, and that goes back to ... ? John D. Rockefeller shit "let's make food and drugs out of oil and feed this poison to people." Honestly, goes back farther. But that is NOT science, that's voodoo politics and witchcraft with the power of media to convince people "science will help you."

@Humpleupagus @Coyote

There are certain truths about how the body responds to exercise that coaches knew for multiple generations many good undergraduate level exercise physiology textbooks or professors confirm these same truths

But then what happens is someone ignores all that and goes for the latest peer review article and claims something contradictory to decades of research by both coaches and academic exercise science and calls it evidence based

Today's article contradicts yesterday's

The problem with the scientific model is that it no longer looks for difference.

When medicine first started "outliers" were looked at as being different for some reason, and often as evidence of a different disease. Now the disease is presumed "known" and outliers are just placebo effects

What is sometimes called Evidence based medicine is not necessarily the same as medicine based on scientific principles or scientific models

Evidence based medicine can go contrary to your personal observations and sometimes follows what Robert Jay Lifton called

Doctrine Over Person

In his book on Totalitarianism

A scientific model may have been tested for multiple generations than predictions maybe made as to the effects of a treatment based on the model

But the latest peer review...

@freepatriot

Only 18 lies would be more honest than honest Abe or most likely any other President in United States of America's history

@ins0mniak @judgedread @petra

I thought Claude was a computerised simulated talk therapy psychologist from more than twenty years ago

But not any ordinary simulated talk therapist

One designed to be extremely funny and say random stuff that was a modified version of a simulated talk therapist called Frank that was designed to actually help treat patients and not as a joke

I do not know how to quickly confirm or refute this

I just remember being shown this joke program

Memory imperfect

@shortstories @ins0mniak @judgedread Error analysis (propagating the error bars through calculations effectively) or statistical significance testing (looking for wee pees), whichever. He's not even making an attempt at doing a serious calculation or analysis.

Imagine someone out there is a woman who married her biological brother to get citizenship when there are plenty of men who are not her biological brother that would agree to marry her

m.youtube.com/watch?v=-hFyJokX

Link that I forgot to include in previous post

Warren Smith commentary on Trump State of the Union

Show thread

@nomebullyyou

One man marrying multiple women would be polygyny

One woman marrying multiple men would be polyandry

Polygamy would be a marriage in which three or more people are married to each other or one person is married to two or more people

an example of Poly monogamy that would also be polygyny might be if a man monogamously marries one woman while being monogamously married to a second woman without the two women being married to each otherm. The 2 figuratively became 1 flesh twice

When the National Election Study first asked the question in 1958, about 73% of Americans said they trusted the federal government to do what is right most or all of the time. Today, that number has collapsed to roughly 17%.

Warren Smith commentary on parts of Trump State of the Union

I do not like Trump because he supports Benjamin Netanyahu but I like Trump's speech and think he made good points at least regarding the parts I heard in this clip

Basicly claiming they only want to remove the requirement for voter ID because they want to cheat

I doubt he will actually fix the problems he mentioned in the speech regarding immigrants that are violent

@petra @ins0mniak @judgedread

I think VOX day said he has a very high IQ but is very bad at math and got his IQ from other parts of the test

There is a difference between choosing margins of error for variables & plugging the values within that range into equations and statistical significance testing

For example you could use significant digits and say that the last digit is significant but uncertain and the second to last digit could be off by 1 this is different than signifance testing

@shortstories I haven't seen anyone reference the Animaniacs in many years. Did they get a reboot or something?

@VeganMGTOW

They put lactose as a filler ingredient in a lot of pills that do not require it since you can not legally just shop around and choose prescriptions on your own is there a way to get the versions of prescription medicines without animal products

Show older
Merovingian Club

A club for red-pilled exiles.