shortstories @[email protected]

Gets a brick thrown in his back and called "horse shit"

Wins worlds strongest man multiple times

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=RN9B3_K1P4Y

Is the message they are trying to convey to try to give people bad experiences so they can win contests?

They did not mention Jews or Israel directly but is this really zionist propaganda that Kikes are good for society because they make people suffer more which helps them win contests?

@FortyTwo

Eld A Itch no hard R

The classification system for who is and is not a Jew used by kikes is not based on ancestry from the real original Israelites if they existed, nor is it based on trying to follow the teachings claimed to be from Moses in the Old Tesrament

When they mention Moses they often mean Moses Mainomides who was not the Old Testament OT Moses

Or some alleged oral teachings of Moses that were from hundreds of years after Jesus who was hundreds of years after Moses which contradict earlier OT Moses

There is a difference between a Jew and a Kike

When I say Kike I mean someone who practices a specific ideology, culture, worldview or religion that labels some people as Jews and other people as Goyim.

They then try to enslave or exterminate all who they classify as Goyim. The means to enslavement maybe very subtle and for example could involve making Goyim into second class citizens who are performing labor for Kikes without their consent.

Trump is only deporting immigrants who do not actively support the Kike agenda

@TheFediFiles

My question is, is Miaja named after Maja the Sky witch from Adventure Time

They are spelled different but that us my question

https://adventuretime.fandom.com/wiki/Maja

Also I do not regularly listen to TheFediFiles so I probably will never hear the answer to my question

I do not even know a website to listen to all the Fedi Files in sequential order from the start

@white_male @djsumdog @jazzilla

So 80% are lazy and 20% try really hard

But imagine if 80% of people with average genetic capability for intelligence do not study very hard

And 20% of people with average genetic capability for intelligence study very hard

Just like in the workplace setting it could result in massive differences of the outcome only in this caee the outcome is being smarter

Sturgeon's law (or Sturgeon's revelation) is an adage stating "ninety percent of everything is crap". It was coined by Theodore Sturgeon, an American science fiction author and critic, and was inspired by his observation that, while science fiction was often derided for its low quality by critics, most work in other fields was low-quality too, and so science fiction was no different.[1]

Wikipedia

@white_male @djsumdog @jazzilla

If those who are smarter than 80% are not vastly smarter than your average person then how come those who are more productive than 80% are vastly more productive than your average person according to the pareto principle

Are they more productive for some reason other than intelligence

@white_male @djsumdog @jazzilla

So raw data is transmuted to look like it fits a bell curve distribution. Then they say the transmuted data fits a bell curve. They transmute the raw intellence scores until they fit a bell curve. The raw intelligence scores also have a maximum score of 100% on the test and have a limit on how hard the questions can be which is probkematic.

People with average intelligence are vastly different from geniuses and treating them as equals is holding society back

@white_male @djsumdog @jazzilla

So are you advocating that most people have about the same amount of intelligence on average and there are not massive gaps between those who study and were not born with cognitive disabilities and those who either do not try to study or were born with cognitive disabilities

Are you arguing that most people are close to equal

Are you arguing that there is not a massive difference between someone who is smarter than 80% of people and an average person?

@djsumdog @jazzilla @white_male

caobility is typo for capability

@djsumdog @jazzilla
@white_male

It is easier to justify Statist communism if you assume a certain kind of bell curve distribution rather than a certain kind of power distribution for intelligence, strength and other attributes that effect the autonomy and productivity and caoability of people

I suspect that is why the default position in the social sciences is to start with a bell curve assumption and then not test if the data would fit some other curve better followed by a t test or z test