SERGEY LAVROV:
"I am going to say something that we have not yet revealed to the public.
We have accumulated a lot of evidence on how the EU embassies in Moscow are preparing for our presidential elections.
I am referring to interference mechanisms, certain 'supporting projects' for the non-systemic opposition – in short, things that embassies have no right to address.
With this information in hand, a week and a half ago, we invited all EU ambassadors [to the foreign ministry].
As a foreign minister, I wanted to tell the heads of missions that we, out of the best intentions, advised them against doing that. So, what do you think happened?
Two days before the appointment, they handed us a diplomatic note saying that they had decided against coming.
Can you imagine relations with states, whose ambassadors are afraid to attend a meeting with the foreign minister of their country of accreditation? Whoever heard of such a thing?
Here are the manners of those arch-partners for you.
President of Russia Vladimir Putin has repeatedly stated that we never reject serious proposals.
For example, the Americans say that we are launching nuclear weapons into space and suggest that we meet and elucidate on strategic stability.
This is cheap talk, not anything for grown-up people. Exhaustive answers were given to proposals of this sort. The same goes for other affairs.
Previously, they suggested resuming inspections of our strategic facilities under the Treaty on the Reduction of Strategic Offensive Arms.
We have explained to them that the treaty was based on trust, mutual indivisible security, and transparency. The Americans have trampled these principles underfoot by declaring us an enemy that should suffer a 'strategic defeat' on the battlefield.
After doing this, without blinking an eye, they ask us if we could let them see our strategic facilities. Is that honest?
So far, none of the Western countries has made any honest proposals.
African countries, Brazil, the Arab League, and China have put forward various ideas on security in Europe, ideas dictated by the best intentions.
All of them are calling for a peaceful solution.
The main aspect of their position (this is clearly outlined in the Chinese initiatives) is that it is necessary, first, to identify the causes of the situation existing in Europe, and, second, to look for a solution based on removing these causes and on respect for the legitimate security interests of all participants.
We are ready to cooperate on this basis. But the West is promoting a ten-point formula, a 'peace formula.'
Now they have duped Switzerland and it is trying to convene meetings and a 'peace conference.' A 'summit' has even been announced. But they don’t want to invite Russia.
Our country will be summoned after they come to terms among themselves. They will hand us a paper that will be an ultimatum pure and simple. Is that serious?
Everyone knows that this will never work.
They constantly say: 'Victory on the battlefield!'
OK, let them try."