shortstories @[email protected]

@shortstories @firawy Obama didn't drain the SPR.

@GaryBussy

When Trump realizes he can not read Chinese

@GrungeQueef @SpectralActivity Fish is barely meaningful as a Kingdom category. The related categories have more diversity than Animals or Reptiles. Yes they're older, but you'd think we have enough new genetic and behavioural information to reinterpret classifications.

@poastoak I need to get these kids eating more spice. Or their parents do
I made Mexican rice flavored with basic trash pace salsa last night and they were telling me it was too spicy
(They still ate it all HH)

This makes Micheal Bloomberg $8 Billion a year https://youtube.com/shorts/JS3vegp0PeU

The TFM Show: May 23rd, 2026

Rumble: https://rumble.com/v7ab3pu-the-tfm-show-may-23rd-2026.html

MGTOW.TV: https://www.mgtow.tv/watch/the-tfm-show-may-23rd-2026_FpvusClI5lfKTde.html

Bitchute: https://www.bitchute.com/video/ubS9KYj5JYpF/

Odysee: https://odysee.com/@TurdFlingingMonkey:1/TFMShowMay23rd2026:3

Kick: https://kick.com/tfmonkey/videos/4177ad51-a9f5-407f-90d1-c934ed62aaff

Waldo sits down every January 1st making a list of places where huge crowds assemble. You don't realize his commitment to getting lost.

Rubio tells Fox News no point to alliance if NATO countries refuse to get more heavily involved in Gulf War

Trump caught snooping in Xi's notebook

I once pulled over somewhere in the dark heart of Texas—probably to urinate, let's be honest—and looked up. I have aphantasia and severely deficient autobiographical memory, which means if I can still recall something, it hit hard enough to leave a physical mark. That sky hit hard enough.

It wasn't a pretty sky. It was a dimensional one. Foreground stars, mid-ground nebulae, background depth—the full 3D stack, no filter, no processing, just photons that had been traveling for millions of

dear donor chads,

reminder that your monthly donyations will be charged in the next probably 72 hours-ish. If you wish to cancel your monthly contribution please log into patron.poa.st and cancel before the 27th!

if you are not a patron, please consider becoming one! we rely on your support to make it work.

god bless you all for being here!

https://patron.poa.st (monthly fiat donyations)
https://give.poast.org (one time fiat donyations)
https://liberapay.com/poast (one time and monthly anonymous fiat donyations)
https://poa.st/donyate/crypto (crypto donyations)

John Methodman

John Presbyterian and John Adventist back up the story though

Wait until you hear Frank Pentecost

*John Method and John England

You seriously expect me, in the year of our lord 2026, to believe this was invented by “John Calvin”. Was he buddies with “John Methodist” and “John Anglican“ too? SMH

@WandererUber @smugumin it is frankly more obvious to me that a human wrote the lion's share of tommy's ghostwriter's article. some specific sentences are arguably llm flavored, but this proves nothing, as even if you read the cnn slop piece about biden, individual sentences come across that way.
>>chatgpt just writes like a journo[id]
if i said that, i overstated; though i distinctly remember mentioning that its style was strongly drawn to journo/academic styles rather than.outright saying it writes like a journoid. to be clear, chatgpt's tone was predominantly influenced by journoidspeak and academic-speak, and rlhf pulled it toward a register that appealed primarily to normies/foids i.e. more like corporate journalism.
>if [it wrote like a journoid] you wouldn't need to amend [...] the prompt
nonsense. journalistic style is itself no monolith. its principles and vocabulary across domains influences ai, but like any other class of writers, there are ever-finer distinctions between.journalistic voice. The Sun does not write like the Daily Mail.
>journos do not write paper abstracts
correct. academics, whose voice is the other attractor of chatgpt's tone as i mentioned, do.
>digging up an article
sorry, i didn't know pre-2025 meant december 31st 1159 hours and 60-10^(-1000) seconds.
>[...] reading articles and determining if it's chatgpt
my point in my first post on this thread was that you tried that and came to the wrong conclusion. i don't think i read a different article than you. it wasn't tommy who wrote that article as you agree, but i contend that it wasn't an llm. the coarse stylistic cues you're drawing on like That One Construction are "Not Surefire Tells Of LLM Authorship — They're A Rhetorical Trick That Predates Sam Altman's Birth."
>game show version
what?
>you deliberately changed chatgpt's style
where are you getting this from?