It's essentially self-evident at this point that the narrative always matters more than the truth. The narrative can be as far fetched and whacky as you want, but so long as there is a good story that makes regular pitstops at the truth, your audience won't recognise or care how loony it is. This is how the Russiagate shit went so far. It's how you get American communist trannies running social media psyops for Ukrainian neo-nazi LARPers. This is why Israel has lost the Gaza information war, because the beheaded jewish babies narrative didn't check in with the reality of 20,000+ dead Palestinians.
The schizoboomerish satan-hating electromagnetic WEF disrespector narrative of "patriots fighting the ethnically ambiguous elite pedo ring globalists" is not a good story and it is sorely in need of pitstops.
Yes, the deep QAnon lore has a lot of adherents, and it's absolutely full of twists and these really far out ideas that wouldnt be out if place in an Indiana Jones reboot, but it makes so many assumptions and is absolutely littered with plot holes, so the only people who are following the story are people who have a really, really high tolerance for assumptions (i.e. schizotypal personality disorder sufferers).
The Epstein shit has been a really lacklustre pitstop for the schizoboomers because it was flying so fucking close to the semitic sun that it risked the whole thing getting OY VEY'd out of the sky by jewish space lasers. However, if this latest supposed document dump reveals Bill Clinton or some other goyish villain in the QAnon mythos has actual involvement in an israeli extortion racket, they're going to ram every car into that pitstop they can.
The documents will be stupid and irrelevant, but it's going to be all the proof some schizoboomer needs to explain why it wasn't jews all the way down.