@YoMomz @Stahesh @UncleIroh @ButtWorldsMan The whole question is one of guilt in intention or guilt in action:
To prevent continued victimization of children we want to prosecute those who are guilty action.
To prevent possible victimization of children we want to prosecute those who are guilty of intention.
We cannot now nor may ever be able to know people's intentions without evidence as displayed by attempts or completed acts.
@DoubleD @YoMomz @UncleIroh @ButtWorldsMan Most of these are people whore are guilty by action.
Even just messaging kids with inappropriately intentions is already action.
One thing is thinking about it and watching sus hentai.
The other is already making first step for future crime.
@Stahesh @YoMomz @UncleIroh @ButtWorldsMan I understand your perspective in this.
The issue is that we have to "draw the line somewhere".
We could prosecute an individual based upon their perceived intention, and you'd probably rightly identify and prevent acts like molesting children, but where do you draw the line?
The state, the means of coercion and control via force then has the authority to criminalize people's intentions because they've been given the responsibility thereof.
@DoubleD @YoMomz @UncleIroh @ButtWorldsMan I
Talking weird things to kid without parents and no reason GUILTY
Starting conversasions with kid for no reason and wanting to meet them or get their picture GUILTY
Not mentioning many the baiters say they are under age and they keep messaging so there is already escalation.
It is like saying the guy did not wanted to stab you he was just getting closer with knife ready to stab you.
He who allows the Alien to live shares in its crime of existence
@DoubleD @YoMomz @UncleIroh @ButtWorldsMan After they make any first sthem they should be marked to kill IMO better to be save than sorry.
Those who understand know that you have no right to let them live
@DoubleD @YoMomz @UncleIroh @ButtWorldsMan We both will follow our WILLS.
So good luck in your journey.✊ 😇
@Stahesh @YoMomz @UncleIroh @ButtWorldsMan I hear you, and I understand that this is a value judgement, which is fine.
A "better safe than sorry" attitude will certainly stop perpetrators, and even if there is a question, you can easily see in many cases what is legitimate and what is not as you outlined above.
As long as you understand the ramifications of your choices, I am sanguine.