This government would rather give Boomers their fucking social security and niggers welfare than actually fund science and advance the country. There is so many new world-changing discoveries and they go nowhere because there’s no funding and the media doesn’t cover it. And no one cares.
All these fucking people will bitch about healthcare this and surgeries that, but will be a roadblock to actual progress like CRISPR therapies, stem cells, and anthrobots. Fuck this society.
🔥🔥🤡🌎🔥🔥
@Mr_Mister Humans already reach peak of tecnological advances The next step Is mix flesh with machine AND to be honest I am not fan of that.
>Humans already reach peak of tecnological advances
People always say this and they're always wrong. You just have normalcy bias trust me there are many great breakthroughs to come
@basedbagel @VeganMGTOW @Mr_Mister
There should be no taxpayer funding to social security and no taxpayer funding to science research nor academia
NASA was science research money welfare for a moon landing that did not happen
COVID 19 vaccines was science research money welfare for COVId 19 that does not exist
Then there is science research money welfare to stop people from exhaling CO2 to fight global warming
Science research welfare encourages fake science
@shortstories @basedbagel @VeganMGTOW I want you all to watch this video and try not to be filled with hope and joy. https://www.reddit.com/r/Damnthatsinteresting/s/UP4TbxstB4
@Mr_Mister that was amazing!
People wonder why I get so angry about the current state of affairs.
We could be investing in tech like this but instead we have gender/race/ and other low IQ talk.
SMDH
@shortstories none of that matters because if the gov doesn't fund research, private interests will and the same issue will occur.
Gov research it's one of the few things the government does that's actually worth a damn.
What they need to do is stop putting taxpayer from the research behind paywalls like JSTOR. Its dumb as hell and robbing the taxpayer
What you say makes perfect sense in theory but doesn't actually pan out in reality.
The problem with privatizing research is that if you come across a breakthrough that would lead into less profitability that study doesn't get published.
this happens a lot
@basedbagel @Mr_Mister @VeganMGTOW
As long as probability based statistics tests are used and the conclusion is come to by an arbitrary choice of alpha value that would be different for another arbitrarily chosen alpha value
And the raw data is not published but only the conclusion of statistical significance or failure to find statistical sugnificance for that alpha value
( Which is how most medical and social science research works )
Research journal research is useless anyway
@basedbagel @Mr_Mister @VeganMGTOW
If I pay taxes for studies whether I approve of them or not then since I can not withdrawal from funding these studies
How do I eliminate studies that do not publish raw data
Currently most peer reviewed journal articles do not publish raw data
I only want to fund studies that publish raw data with the identity of the medical participant's name anonymous
All studies that do not publish raw data are malinformation, misinformation or disinformation
@basedbagel @Mr_Mister @VeganMGTOW
I will not be paying taxes to fund such math lies so if private interests want to fund such lies at least I can opt out of funding it
What corporation would profit from doing all their calculations wrong and having their engineering malfunction becauss they decided to fund research that you can add two positive numbers and get a negative number?
Priviatizing science would reduce such errors becauss they would make corporations lose money