This government would rather give Boomers their fucking social security and niggers welfare than actually fund science and advance the country. There is so many new world-changing discoveries and they go nowhere because there’s no funding and the media doesn’t cover it. And no one cares.
All these fucking people will bitch about healthcare this and surgeries that, but will be a roadblock to actual progress like CRISPR therapies, stem cells, and anthrobots. Fuck this society.
🔥🔥🤡🌎🔥🔥
Why was Thanos right?
@Mr_Mister
Thanos said that if you get rid of half the people you would solve most of our problems.
The only issue is he chose the half at random.
Ideally If we removed the bottom half of society aka the parasites we would be objectively better off as a species
You are not half retarded, you are a full whole retard.
Even Thanos cannot snap away your retardation.
>Even Thanos cannot snap away your retardation
Normies make me pay for their inability to save for retirement or payback student loans, and have no problem with me being jobless 2nd class citizen over a vax.
Yet IM insane for saying I could do without them. Ok fine That's cool.
I just want you to know that if the very normies you're defending heard your views on TV they would have no problem with you being in jail for far right conspiracy theory anti-Semitism.
I have things to do, but if I get time later and I honestly think that arguing with someone who thinks gencociding the poorest half of the world will heal the world is not either a troll, a fed or a retard, then I will.
Don't hold your breath though.
I'm not trolling I just ave a uncommon opinion.
>gencociding the poorest half of the world
1st of all I am NOT pro genocide of anyone. That would be hypocritical as I just criticized Uncle Ted.
I AM pro herd-culling
I agree with some of Thanos' ideas but I'm too soft a pastry to hurt anyone.
And I don't want 1/2 of 🌎 gone i want the normie parasites out of my country which is probly only ~20%
If you can support yourself /MYOB then it's all good.
@basedbagel we don’t have to genocide the poor we just can’t babysit them or constantly give them free money.
The only people you should actually genocide are communists and progressives because they deserve it.
I on the other hand would rather just openly enslave the poor if they want welfare so badly. At least then they can be forced to be productive.
>only people you should actually genocide are communists and progressives
I agree with you in principle but remember how they were ready to PUT US IN FUCKING CAMPS for our private medical decisions?
Pepperidge farm remembers!
I would rather enslave them too but its not feasible. They out number is.
A democracy requires an educated populus to function.
If people just read a book and paid attention wed be fine.
We wouldn't even have to fight! We could just say no
@Mr_Mister
Think about all the time we WASTE on dick v pussy/race conversations alone.
Imagine if we all agreed to disagree but have unified front to combat commie subversion.
Done! Problem solved.
We could colonize Jupiter by now.
But nooo, instead we must point fingers at each race/gender that isn't us and have the same conversations over and over and over and over that go nowhere!
It's so exhausting! 😩
Colonizing Jupiter would be a mistake but not as bad a mistake as colonizing venus or mercury
@shortstories We can’t colonize Jupiter because it’s a gaseous planet. There’s no ground to walk on and the pressure will just crush everything.
@basedbagel this back and forth victim blaming is because of democracy and progressivism.
@Mr_Mister
True but I'm beginning to wonder if it's human nature to be this petty and pedantic.
You can even see this pattern of behavior in ancient civilizations where people just point fingers instead of solving the real problems
@basedbagel @UncleIroh @Mr_Mister
Normie parasites are more than 50% if voting is real because otherwise normie parasites would discontinue getting their way
Based bagel said, "And I don't want 1/2 of 🌎 gone i want the normie parasites out of my country which is probly only ~20%"
@basedbagel @UncleIroh @Mr_Mister
Different groups of people vote for welfare in different percentages this means that if you banished people who vote for welfare from the country that you live in then you would be accused of committing genocide because you are banishing a higher percent of people from certain people groups
The act of non lethal banishing will be called murder because if they do not get the welfare they will claim they will die
That was all conjecture.
The OVERWHELMING MAJORITY of welfare is single mothers...
Hence why TWRA is so crucial
@UncleIroh @Mr_Mister it's over 50% because women vote.
I don't want to murder anyone.
I just want women and parasites to stop voting and leave me alone.
I will do whatever it takes to preserve my freedom
@basedbagel @UncleIroh @Mr_Mister
A much higher percent of blacks and Jews voted for the Democratic welfare party than Whites for multiple decades
During George Bush time in office most Muslim voters voted Republican because he treated them with respect other than going to war against Muslim countries
Later Republican candidates mocked Muslims
Muslims swung their votes depending on how the politicians treated Muslims
Republicans pander to Jews the most
But Jews still mostly vote Democrat
None of that matters if you don't address the women.
Black people are like 13% of the population and Jews are 6%
Even if the ALL went on welfare we could afford it.
It's the women that are driving us bankrupt but everyone just wants to talk about blacks and Jews so the problem will never be solved
@basedbagel @UncleIroh @Mr_Mister
80% Of Jews Vote Democratic — Far More Than Other Faiths
https://forward.com/fast-forward/413776/80-of-jews-vote-democratic-far-more-than-other-faiths/
Who is paying for the commercials to influence people to vote Democrat, and the commercials, academia, movie, news and entertainment saying that it is important for women to vote?
@Mr_Mister Humans already reach peak of tecnological advances The next step Is mix flesh with machine AND to be honest I am not fan of that.
>Humans already reach peak of tecnological advances
People always say this and they're always wrong. You just have normalcy bias trust me there are many great breakthroughs to come
@basedbagel @VeganMGTOW @Mr_Mister
There should be no taxpayer funding to social security and no taxpayer funding to science research nor academia
NASA was science research money welfare for a moon landing that did not happen
COVID 19 vaccines was science research money welfare for COVId 19 that does not exist
Then there is science research money welfare to stop people from exhaling CO2 to fight global warming
Science research welfare encourages fake science
@shortstories that’s not a problem is science funding it’s a problem of pushing this globohomo bullshit to try and conquer the world.
> no taxpayer funding to science research nor academia
That would stifle innovation
@basedbagel @VeganMGTOW @Mr_Mister
It would not stifle innovations that people wanted to invent because they believed the inventions would help them in their personal lives
It would only stifle innovations that provide no immediate benefit like sending only specific people to the moon at the expense of other people who do not get to allegedly travel to the moon
@shortstories No it would absolutely stifle innovation.
Just look at how much people actually care about science, it’s practically no one.
But most importantly, scientific funding will never be privately funded because it’s not a viable business model. There’s no consistent production or output or goods that could be sold for a profit, plus the machines, tools and chemicals cost millions of dollars.
The only one that can foot the bill is the government unfortunately.
@shortstories @basedbagel @VeganMGTOW I want you all to watch this video and try not to be filled with hope and joy. https://www.reddit.com/r/Damnthatsinteresting/s/UP4TbxstB4
@Mr_Mister that was amazing!
People wonder why I get so angry about the current state of affairs.
We could be investing in tech like this but instead we have gender/race/ and other low IQ talk.
SMDH
@basedbagel I started crying just a little bit cuz I’m just so happy. But then I remember Al l the bullshit going on and it turns into depression and rage
@Mr_Mister
No tears left to cry after the vax but I feel the SAME way.
Just remember not every country is with the bullshit.
When Im filled with rage I workout or I repeat my plan to myself in my head.
1. Get money 💰
2. Pay off debt
3. Leave the U.S. in the dust
🖕 everything and everyone else until the mission is complete.
Everyone isn't gonna make it but still have time to save ourselves and never look back
@basedbagel @Mr_Mister @VeganMGTOW
People with PHDs are lying to people saying you can get a negative number by adding two positive scalar real numbers together
and they are getting taxpayer funding for string theory research based on such lies and other people are paid lots of money to pretend they are telling the truth when they know they are lying
This is why we can not have good things
And numberphile has not been banned for misinformation
@shortstories none of that matters because if the gov doesn't fund research, private interests will and the same issue will occur.
Gov research it's one of the few things the government does that's actually worth a damn.
What they need to do is stop putting taxpayer from the research behind paywalls like JSTOR. Its dumb as hell and robbing the taxpayer
@basedbagel @Mr_Mister @VeganMGTOW
I will not be paying taxes to fund such math lies so if private interests want to fund such lies at least I can opt out of funding it
What corporation would profit from doing all their calculations wrong and having their engineering malfunction becauss they decided to fund research that you can add two positive numbers and get a negative number?
Priviatizing science would reduce such errors becauss they would make corporations lose money
What you say makes perfect sense in theory but doesn't actually pan out in reality.
The problem with privatizing research is that if you come across a breakthrough that would lead into less profitability that study doesn't get published.
this happens a lot
@basedbagel @Mr_Mister @VeganMGTOW
As long as probability based statistics tests are used and the conclusion is come to by an arbitrary choice of alpha value that would be different for another arbitrarily chosen alpha value
And the raw data is not published but only the conclusion of statistical significance or failure to find statistical sugnificance for that alpha value
( Which is how most medical and social science research works )
Research journal research is useless anyway
@basedbagel @Mr_Mister @VeganMGTOW
If I pay taxes for studies whether I approve of them or not then since I can not withdrawal from funding these studies
How do I eliminate studies that do not publish raw data
Currently most peer reviewed journal articles do not publish raw data
I only want to fund studies that publish raw data with the identity of the medical participant's name anonymous
All studies that do not publish raw data are malinformation, misinformation or disinformation
@basedbagel @VeganMGTOW @Mr_Mister
Duell said in 1902:
In my opinion, all previous advances in the various lines of invention will appear totally insignificant when compared with those which the present century will witness. I almost wish that I might live my life over again to see the wonders which are at the threshold.[7]
...
"isn't there a clerk who can examine patents?" A boy replied "Quite unnecessary, Sir. Everything that can be invented has been invented."[8]
@shortstories yeah but look at what’s happened since then:
Rocket ships, computers, electricity, MRIs, laboratory sciences, the Haber-Bosch process, hydroponic labs, CRISPR, bionics, stem cells, laser technology. There’s just so much more that can be done
@Mr_Mister
This is why I always say Thanos was right.