I'm confused about this Trump verdict.
So he has a 355 million fine for supposedly overvaluing his real estate to get better bank loans.
Why is it not the lenders he supposedly defrauded suing him instead of the state of New york?
Why is the state of New York interfering with private business?
Can someone explain this to me I'm kinda confused
@basedbagel The government determines the value. They do take into account what current market rates are. But in the end, it's the appraisal district whose opinion matters. You can hire an appraiser or real estate agent to give a second opinion, but at best the court will just throw you a bone and lower it a tad, but that's it.
@RoninGrey @basedbagel @shortstories Ronin is correct about valuation of realestate. As to your question about why the lender didn't sue Trump and the state is as well as why not charge him with a crime, criminal court is more difficult in terms of getting a guilty verdict and achieving an conviction by design in the US. The government doesn't need to put someone behind bars to keep them out of power. Keep in mind that this verdict wasn't on whether or not Trump was guilty of fraud...
Ok so this is legalized extortion then? Got it.
Just wanted to make sure I understood what was going on without bias because I really don't understand real estate or NY law
@RoninGrey @basedbagel @DoubleD
Involuntary property tax for services you did not agree to be taxed in exchange for is the method to commit genocide against working non parasite people especially white gentiles
@basedbagel @DoubleD @shortstories Well, no, it is at least based a lot on market price in the area and assumes home prices go up (they usually do). But it is a bit of guesswork. That's why you can go to them and say "My home specifically is worth 'X'."
The extortion is being taxed at all, imo.