Based_Accelerationist @[email protected]

@PunishedD @Thisisme Ok, then why haven't they done that in Ukraine? Why did they allow the women to leave and are still not drafting them in droves to operate their drones?
You'd think they wouldn't do such a thing in the US without at least testing it in Ukraine first.

What I think this is, is a scare tactic. They scare the public into thinking they might draft women and then, when the bill gets shut down and they only draft the men, most people are relieved, now it doesn't sound as bad.

@shortstories Problem is, most people who want you to "believe all women" no longer say "trans women are real women", because they want to gatekeep feminism.

Everyone's joining forces to protect women from the trans movement, tells you what Americans are really about.

@PunishedD @Thisisme And they need that kind of an excuse, one that would betray their main demographic just to pivot to drone-based warfare, which they're already doing anyway?
Drafting men to fight against Russia/China/Iran is already a gamble, but throw in their women too and all the American simps might just revolt.

If they actually start drafting women, then I'll have to believe their goal is population reduction/civil war or something, because it's a downright crazy move.

@sardonicsmile Well, I'm sure those men whose names were forgotten don't mind it one bit, since they fought and died for feminism and global homo. So it's probably a good thing that no one cares about them, just like no one cares about vets after their bodies have ceased to be useful. Let women steal their "credit", it might be less pathetic if we believe women were the ones who surrendered the world to these small hat pedos. Screw their service and screw them.

@Thisisme It won't pass, if they still aren't drafting most women in Ukraine, they're not going to draft women in the US either.

More important than who's getting drafted to WW3, is who's going to refuse and violently tell the government/military/police to go fuck themselves. Women aren't going to do that, will the men?

@Indignation Money is their only religion. Anything for those youtube shekels.

@I_AmTheKnight Indeed. Looks are and always were very important, especially when your job depends on the people's approval (as you pointed out, US Presidents tend to be relatively well-built and presentable). However, the people actually in charge of the country aren't exactly eye-pleasing, some barely even look human. If chads were actually in charge, while betas were treated as serfs, I think you'd see some changes.

@vic @VooDooMedic Actually, yes. It's legal, lawful and consented (even enforced) by the masses.

@Tfmonkey Not only aren't they a problem, they're the solution. They're societal poison and that's what we need the most.

@thunderwarrior That must be the most closet homosexual show in existence. I mean, the fans are closet homos, but whoever wrote/drew that isn't just out of the closet, they're out of the damn stratosphere heading to Uranus.

@Pain66 You don't JUST take women's voting rights, because they didn't give themselves those rights. They were given by Jews and are protected by the subservient goyim.
So, unless we somehow get rid of the majority of men OR Israel and zionism disappears, we're not taking women's rights away.

Voting rights are also a non-issue in this current system. If every politician is a puppet, are voting rights really the problem?

@Pain66 That actually doesn't sound too bad, if reality worked like that. The Chads (mostly masculine, violent, impulsive, individualistic) would get all the perks while the Betas (mostly weak, collectivist, backstabbing, low-T) would be serfs and die out, in theory. Very nice.

In truth, it would be chaos, because women don't have what it takes to rule society and you'd see violent revolutions after enough suffering had been experienced. Still better than this dystopia though.